Jupiter announced multiple things at their flagship conference, Catstanbul, last month. TLDR â it was a lot. There was a burning cat, acquisition announcements, and last but not least, the protocolâs open admittance of its ambition to become bigger than its current home. In todayâs piece, we dissect Jupiterâs recent business strategies and why given enough times, every crypto app that owns the users will vertically integrate to capture maximal value. Letâs dive in.
Recap of the events.
Candidly, this is one of the best product roadmap and new initiative announcements Iâve seen in the past few quarters. The Jupiter teamâs ability to execute is top-notch, from the extremely detailed communication (Meow literally tweeted essays on a daily basis) to the level of transparency theyâre trying to uphold with their communities.
Hereâs a prime example:
This transparency audit explained all the key movements done by the Jupiter team. âWeâve been posting and tracking the token flow since genesis, and over 2 audits, accounted for every single one of our tokens (except for 1 JUP) and consolidated tokens into recognized wallets.â
Read the last sentence again. Itâs imperative for any crypto protocols that have TGEd to do their best to track the ownership of every single one of their tokens. Similarly, a publicly traded company will have a very clear picture of the ownership stack of its equities. In crypto, this is harder to do as blockchain rails are permissionless, but there are tools that can help the team do this exercise with a decent level of accuracy.
Meanwhile, UniswapâŠ
Anyway, enough glazing of the cat.
The point of todayâs piece is to remind crypto founders that business strategies in a permissionless environment are different in a permissioned environment.
Outside of crypto, businesses can build moats via regulatory capture, lengthy B2B contracts, and other forms of proprietary innovation.
In crypto, the same types of moats are significantly weaker because of the permissionless nature of blockchain technology. Everybody can build a product on top of each other and users have almost unlimited alternatives.
As a result, all that matters is brand, user experience, and community. This is because given enough time and the maturity level of our industry, weâll see more experienced operators come onto our scene and build on top of the existing infrastructure, vampire-attacking the incumbents.
Ironically, itâs kinda similar to what Deepseek is currently doing to OpenAI.
Alas, in crypto, moats eventually settle down to:
Before Jupiterâs success, many were skeptical of the aggregation model because it hasnât boded that well in terms of market capitalization comparison in EVM. 1inch wasnât able to surpass Uniswapâs value because users are still opting to use Uniswap (too lazy) or other MEV-friendly DEXs such as CoW Swap. However, in Solana land, Jupiter was able to convince users that they have the best swapping experience, aggregate all the users, and capture the values.
To be frank, I wasnât sure when this exactly happened. I remember using Orca and Raydium during the DeFi summer of 2020-2021, as well as using Jupiter in its early days. If my memory serves me right, the experience of using Orca and Raydium was quite bad towards the end of DeFi summer because of the lack of token standards (multiple versions of bridged USDC) and the UIs themselves were sometimes quite laggy. The remnants of this bad UX can still be seen even a year ago.
Jupiter used to highlight its routes to show users that it provides the best rates when swapping tokens. In retrospect, that was a great move because, unlike Ethereum, there wasnât a clear market winner in the Solana DEXs landscape back then. Even when Raydium had the highest market share, its market dominance was nowhere near Uniswap in Ethereum.
In short, Jupiter executed much better on its core focusâaggregating the swapping experience for Solana users. Many protocols have tried this in EVM land but without much success. It also helped that the Jupiter team was initially started by Meow under Racoon Dev, meaning that during the bear market, it could minimize burn as much as possible by having a few engineers in lower-cost emerging markets maintain its user experience.
Not everything has to be seen from a âsexy startup angleâ, many successful founders in crypto started by running dev shops. Running these types of âconventional service businessesâ teaches you savvy business operations experience particularly around being extremely efficient with cost and how to opportunistically tap into certain market verticals.
Fast forward to 2024, we can see this savvy business operations experience coming out of the Jupiter team.
Within 12 months, the Jupiter team acquired 5 teams:
Forgive my French, but this is a fucking genius move. I donât think I have to go into the details, but some of the businesses getting acquired had significant competitions and challenges in the markets that made the team a prime acquihire target. Also, I donât have any private information, but I wonât be surprised if the majority of the acquisitions are done via JUP tokens. Given JUPâs current FDV, the Jupiter team got a pretty good deal on top of essentially expanding their cap table/team members with capable builders.
This idea isnât new. Dan Elitzer from Nascent wrote about an appchain-centric future in 2022. Titled âThe Inevitability of UNIchainâ, the argument is the following:
âTherefore, once applications reach a certain size, it starts to become increasingly important to have more direct control over their accessâand their usersâ costs for accessingâblockspace. The solution to this is a chain or rollup where access to blockspace is managed by validators whose primary concern is the success of a single applicationâtheir own.â
I posit a similar but much simpler human-centric view to look at this. Stripping everything away, itâs simply human behavior in a capitalistic business society to optimize for capturing more value. Itâs just the same old âvertical integrationâ above any technical arguments around blockspace and decentralization. Crypto, after all, is still being run by humans â weâre not above this innate desire to own more of the value chain. Letâs be pragmatic.
Jupiter announced multiple things at their flagship conference, Catstanbul, last month. TLDR â it was a lot. There was a burning cat, acquisition announcements, and last but not least, the protocolâs open admittance of its ambition to become bigger than its current home. In todayâs piece, we dissect Jupiterâs recent business strategies and why given enough times, every crypto app that owns the users will vertically integrate to capture maximal value. Letâs dive in.
Recap of the events.
Candidly, this is one of the best product roadmap and new initiative announcements Iâve seen in the past few quarters. The Jupiter teamâs ability to execute is top-notch, from the extremely detailed communication (Meow literally tweeted essays on a daily basis) to the level of transparency theyâre trying to uphold with their communities.
Hereâs a prime example:
This transparency audit explained all the key movements done by the Jupiter team. âWeâve been posting and tracking the token flow since genesis, and over 2 audits, accounted for every single one of our tokens (except for 1 JUP) and consolidated tokens into recognized wallets.â
Read the last sentence again. Itâs imperative for any crypto protocols that have TGEd to do their best to track the ownership of every single one of their tokens. Similarly, a publicly traded company will have a very clear picture of the ownership stack of its equities. In crypto, this is harder to do as blockchain rails are permissionless, but there are tools that can help the team do this exercise with a decent level of accuracy.
Meanwhile, UniswapâŠ
Anyway, enough glazing of the cat.
The point of todayâs piece is to remind crypto founders that business strategies in a permissionless environment are different in a permissioned environment.
Outside of crypto, businesses can build moats via regulatory capture, lengthy B2B contracts, and other forms of proprietary innovation.
In crypto, the same types of moats are significantly weaker because of the permissionless nature of blockchain technology. Everybody can build a product on top of each other and users have almost unlimited alternatives.
As a result, all that matters is brand, user experience, and community. This is because given enough time and the maturity level of our industry, weâll see more experienced operators come onto our scene and build on top of the existing infrastructure, vampire-attacking the incumbents.
Ironically, itâs kinda similar to what Deepseek is currently doing to OpenAI.
Alas, in crypto, moats eventually settle down to:
Before Jupiterâs success, many were skeptical of the aggregation model because it hasnât boded that well in terms of market capitalization comparison in EVM. 1inch wasnât able to surpass Uniswapâs value because users are still opting to use Uniswap (too lazy) or other MEV-friendly DEXs such as CoW Swap. However, in Solana land, Jupiter was able to convince users that they have the best swapping experience, aggregate all the users, and capture the values.
To be frank, I wasnât sure when this exactly happened. I remember using Orca and Raydium during the DeFi summer of 2020-2021, as well as using Jupiter in its early days. If my memory serves me right, the experience of using Orca and Raydium was quite bad towards the end of DeFi summer because of the lack of token standards (multiple versions of bridged USDC) and the UIs themselves were sometimes quite laggy. The remnants of this bad UX can still be seen even a year ago.
Jupiter used to highlight its routes to show users that it provides the best rates when swapping tokens. In retrospect, that was a great move because, unlike Ethereum, there wasnât a clear market winner in the Solana DEXs landscape back then. Even when Raydium had the highest market share, its market dominance was nowhere near Uniswap in Ethereum.
In short, Jupiter executed much better on its core focusâaggregating the swapping experience for Solana users. Many protocols have tried this in EVM land but without much success. It also helped that the Jupiter team was initially started by Meow under Racoon Dev, meaning that during the bear market, it could minimize burn as much as possible by having a few engineers in lower-cost emerging markets maintain its user experience.
Not everything has to be seen from a âsexy startup angleâ, many successful founders in crypto started by running dev shops. Running these types of âconventional service businessesâ teaches you savvy business operations experience particularly around being extremely efficient with cost and how to opportunistically tap into certain market verticals.
Fast forward to 2024, we can see this savvy business operations experience coming out of the Jupiter team.
Within 12 months, the Jupiter team acquired 5 teams:
Forgive my French, but this is a fucking genius move. I donât think I have to go into the details, but some of the businesses getting acquired had significant competitions and challenges in the markets that made the team a prime acquihire target. Also, I donât have any private information, but I wonât be surprised if the majority of the acquisitions are done via JUP tokens. Given JUPâs current FDV, the Jupiter team got a pretty good deal on top of essentially expanding their cap table/team members with capable builders.
This idea isnât new. Dan Elitzer from Nascent wrote about an appchain-centric future in 2022. Titled âThe Inevitability of UNIchainâ, the argument is the following:
âTherefore, once applications reach a certain size, it starts to become increasingly important to have more direct control over their accessâand their usersâ costs for accessingâblockspace. The solution to this is a chain or rollup where access to blockspace is managed by validators whose primary concern is the success of a single applicationâtheir own.â
I posit a similar but much simpler human-centric view to look at this. Stripping everything away, itâs simply human behavior in a capitalistic business society to optimize for capturing more value. Itâs just the same old âvertical integrationâ above any technical arguments around blockspace and decentralization. Crypto, after all, is still being run by humans â weâre not above this innate desire to own more of the value chain. Letâs be pragmatic.