ZKsync fundador desacredita las dudas de Canton: La prueba ZK no es un riesgo sistémico, la confianza en un solo punto sí lo es

robot
Generación de resúmenes en curso

Deep Tide TechFlow message, March 28, regarding the Canton Network founding team’s challenge that zero-knowledge proofs are overly complex, may have potential vulnerabilities, and are difficult to detect, and therefore are not suitable for institutional-grade financial infrastructure. ZKsync founder Alex Gluchowski posted a response stating that this logic essentially simply derives “the technology has flaws” into “it is unusable,” while ignoring the key design principle of “redundancy and isolation” that is commonly used in critical systems. Canton relies on trusted operators for data isolation and lacks cryptographic verification and independent validation mechanisms. Once a critical node is compromised, an erroneous state could silently propagate within the system, creating systemic risk.

Alex Gluchowski added that, as a representative of an open ecosystem, Ethereum has undergone long-term, high-intensity adversarial testing, and its security is far higher than that of closed systems. The true core is not whether vulnerabilities exist, but whether the system has the capability for redundant protection and risk isolation.

ZK-4,18%
ETH-2,81%
Ver originales
Esta página puede contener contenido de terceros, que se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos (sin garantías ni declaraciones) y no debe considerarse como un respaldo por parte de Gate a las opiniones expresadas ni como asesoramiento financiero o profesional. Consulte el Descargo de responsabilidad para obtener más detalles.
  • Recompensa
  • Comentar
  • Republicar
  • Compartir
Comentar
Añadir un comentario
Añadir un comentario
Sin comentarios
  • Anclado