Recently, I saw someone delegate governance votes to a "familiar KOL," saying it was more convenient... I also understand, with a bunch of tokens in the wallet, who has time to read proposals every day. But after delegating for a long time, it feels strange: tokens are dispersed, but votes are becoming more concentrated, eventually like a few addresses are "replacing everyone’s agreement." Who exactly is governance token governing? Honestly, it might have initially governed ordinary people: if you don't vote, you default to letting others vote; if you're lazy, you hand over the steering wheel.

Modularization and the DA layer development team are quite excited, and it's normal for users to be confused; in the end, the complexity makes it even easier for "I don't understand, you choose for me." My biggest fear isn't losing money, but losing control—if money is lost, you can review it; if power is handed over, it's very hard to get back. Anyway, I now delegate with two or three different strategies, occasionally vote manually myself, at least knowing which way the car is turning.