Recently, everyone has been talking about on-chain privacy and compliance boundaries. To put it simply, ordinary users shouldn't expect to be "completely invisible." On-chain data is inherently public, and tools and tagging systems are not infallible—they can sometimes be delayed or misleading. But in the end, if you really want to investigate, you can still piece together clues... My own expectation is: don't make everyday transfers as complicated as money laundering routes, avoid cross-chain/mixing actions as much as possible, and if you do use them, be aware that the worst-case scenario is being frozen or asked to explain the source.

What I fear most is not slowness, but chaos—taking things slowly allows for address and path verification; chaos makes it easier to step into the wrong pools/bridges, and the money gets stuck in the middle. Anyway, I now prefer to wait for a few more confirmations, look at liquidity gaps more carefully, rather than having to prove my innocence later with a bunch of transaction records.