Dancing up and down💃🏻, it’s a dilemma either way. Anyway, I don’t chase highs, and I stop you from chasing highs every day. If you insist on chasing highs, there’s nothing I can do. How about taking a break and watching from the sidelines? Eat when you’re hungry and drink when you’re thirsty. $BTC ‌#BTC突破86000美元关口 ##美国9月非农新增2.9万 $ETH ‌

#ShareWeekly #PlanYourTradesThisWeek My Trading Plan for This Volatile Week MY TRADING PLAN FOR THIS VOLATILE WEEK: MACRO, LIQUIDITY AND SELECTIVE POSITIONING This week I am treating volatility as a market signal, not as noise. Crypto, commodities and technology stocks are moving under the influence of several forces at the same time: the weak U.S. September jobs report, changing Federal Reserve expectations, upcoming CPI and PPI data, elevated Treasury yields, the uncertain U.S.-Iran situation, oil-price pressure, ETF flows, liquidity and leveraged positioning. My strategy is therefore not to chase every green candle or panic on every red candle. I want to trade confirmed levels, expanding volume and liquidity, while keeping position size under control. The first major volatility catalyst is the September Nonfarm Payrolls report. The U.S. added only 29,000 jobs in September versus roughly 90,000 expected, unemployment rose from 4.1% to 4.2%, and wage growth slowed to 3.0% year over year. Previous payrolls were also revised lower by about 60,000. This is important because a weaker labor market can reduce pressure on the Fed to keep rates high, but inflation and energy prices can still force policymakers to remain cautious. That conflict is exactly why markets can move sharply in both directions. CPI and PPI are now my next major macro checkpoints. September CPI is scheduled for October 14 and September PPI for October 15. I will not focus only on the headline number. I want to see core inflation, monthly momentum and the effect of energy prices. Softer CPI and PPI would strengthen the argument for easier policy expectations and could support BTC, ETH, equities and other liquidity-sensitive assets. Hotter inflation would push yields and the dollar higher and could pressure high-beta crypto and technology stocks. The reaction after the data matters more to me than the headline itself. The Federal Reserve is another major volatility engine. The Fed raised its target range to 3.75%-4.00% in September, and officials have indicated that there is still time to assess incoming data before the October 27-28 meeting. My strategy is not to predict the Fed weeks in advance. I will watch how the market prices the next decision through Treasury yields, the dollar and rate expectations. If employment weakens while inflation cools, risk assets can receive a liquidity boost. If inflation remains sticky and oil stays high, the market may price a more restrictive path and pressure risk assets. The U.S.-Iran situation is equally important because it connects geopolitics with oil, inflation and global liquidity. Recent talks remain uncertain and the Strait of Hormuz is still a major risk point. Brent recently traded around $101-$103 while WTI was around $89-$91, although oil moved lower today as Middle Eastern exports improved and the G7 announced emergency reserve releases. My strategy is to monitor oil rather than ignore it. If Brent pushes higher again, I will treat that as an inflation warning. If oil continues to cool, it can reduce pressure on inflation expectations and help risk assets. Bitcoin remains my primary market indicator. BTC is around $86,000-$86,500 and recently tested the $87,000 area after recovering from roughly $84,000. The latest market range has been approximately $83,900-$87,000, showing a daily movement of more than 3%. For me, $87,000 is the key confirmation level and $84,000-$83,800 is the major support and liquidity zone. I do not want to chase BTC directly below resistance. A clean breakout above $87,000 with stronger spot volume can open $88,500, $90,000 and potentially $92,000. If BTC loses $84,000 with heavy selling, I would reduce risk and watch $83,000-$82,000 instead of blindly buying the dip. ETF flows are strengthening the importance of spot demand. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded about $134 million of inflows across the first two trading days of October, while the broader previous week also showed strong Bitcoin ETF demand. On October 2, Bitcoin ETFs were reported to have taken in roughly $120 million, while Ether ETFs saw around $65 million of outflows. This divergence matters. I want BTC price strength to be supported by spot ETF inflows and real volume rather than only futures leverage. If ETF inflows continue while BTC holds above $87,000, I would be more comfortable adding selectively. If price rises while ETF demand weakens and open interest becomes crowded, I would become defensive. ETH is around $2,700-$2,730 and remains my second major market indicator. Recent trading has shown a wide range near $2,690-$2,815, demonstrating that ETH can move rapidly when liquidity changes. I want $2,650-$2,670 to hold on pullbacks and $2,740-$2,800 to be reclaimed with volume before increasing exposure aggressively. If ETH breaks higher with BTC confirmation, it can signal that risk appetite is expanding beyond Bitcoin. If ETH loses $2,650, I would reduce leverage and wait for a new base. ZEC is a much higher-volatility opportunity. ZEC is around $1,300-$1,340, and its recent price action has been much more aggressive than BTC. Recent ZEC ETF data also showed roughly $93.6 million of weekly outflows, the first negative week after launch. That tells me not to confuse a strong narrative with guaranteed demand. My strategy is smaller position sizing, no emotional averaging and confirmation from volume. If ZEC stabilizes after the recent move and buyers return with increasing volume, I can consider a momentum trade. If selling accelerates, I would wait for liquidity to settle. HYPE is also a high-beta asset on my watchlist. HYPE is around $92-$94 and can move much faster than BTC during momentum sessions. I am watching the $90 area as a psychological support and $94-$98 as an important momentum zone. I do not want to enter after a vertical candle simply because the chart looks strong. I want volume expansion, controlled open interest and confirmation that buyers are defending higher lows. If $90 breaks decisively, I would rather wait for a new liquidity base than average down. GT is important to me because it combines market momentum with the Gate ecosystem. GT is around $11.10-$11.20, with recent sessions showing a range near $10.83-$11.27 and meaningful daily turnover. I want to see whether GT can hold $11.00 and reclaim $11.20-$11.30 with expanding volume. A sustained move above that area would improve momentum, while a loss of $11.00 would make me more selective. My approach is to accumulate only on controlled pullbacks or confirmed breakouts, not chase a sudden vertical candle. Strategy: start with 25%-30% of the planned position and add only after price and volume confirm. BTC and ETH are my main liquidity indicators; GT is my ecosystem watch, while ZEC, HYPE, DOGE and XRP require smaller sizing because volatility expands quickly. I will watch NVDA and MU as AI indicators, while gold, oil, Treasury yields and the dollar help judge broader risk. My weekly plan is to identify liquidity, wait for confirmation, then manage the position. If BTC holds above $87,000 with strong spot demand, I can add. If it stays between $84,000 and $87,000, I prefer range trades. If $84,000 breaks with heavy selling, I reduce risk and wait for a new structure. The key events are CPI on October 14, PPI on October 15 and the October 27-28 Fed meeting, while U.S.-Iran developments, oil, gold, yields and ETF flows can change the setup. For me, volatility is not the enemy; unmanaged volatility is. I want price, liquidity, volume, open interest, funding and ETF flows to confirm before increasing risk. BTC around $86K is at a decision point, ETH around $2.7K needs confirmation, ZEC and HYPE require smaller risk, GT remains an ecosystem watch, DOGE and XRP need volume confirmation, and NVDA and MU can quickly expand their ranges. Goal: protect capital, wait for confirmation and participate only when the market gives a setup. $NVDA $MU ‌ ‌

#HYPE财库公司持仓超32亿美元 #作手分析 🔥 HYPE treasury holdings surpass $3.2 billion! Breaking past the previous high against market pressure—how far can the long-term thesis go? Trading watch: $HYPE $BTC $ETH The hot topic on GATE Square is very interesting: Nasdaq-listed treasury company Hyperliquid Strategies has once again increased its holdings by approximately 1.9 million HYPE, bringing its total holdings to approximately 37 million HYPE, worth more than $3.2 billion. Many people may only think when they see this: “Another institution is footing the bill.” But what I’m more interested in is: What exactly is the relationship between this company and HYPE? And why do I remain bullish on HYPE over the long term despite recent macro market pressure? 📊 I. Unveiling the connection: HYPE’s “treasury proxy” in U.S. stocks Hyperliquid is the protocol, HYPE is the native token, and Hyperliquid Strategies is an independent publicly listed digital asset treasury company. One of its core businesses is continuously accumulating HYPE and participating in the ecosystem through staking and other means. I prefer to understand it as HYPE’s “treasury proxy” in traditional capital markets. To some extent, it plays a role similar to MSTR’s in the BTC ecosystem—using the financing capabilities of traditional capital markets to continuously expand its HYPE treasury, allowing investors in traditional stock markets to gain HYPE exposure. 🔥 II. Breaking the previous bull-market high despite market pressure, demonstrating clear relative strength According to market data, HYPE’s high during last year’s bull market was approximately $59.5. After enduring the macro-driven market crash and washout in this cycle, HYPE not only avoided falling back to its starting point but instead broke back above $59.5 and continued to set new all-time highs. The current price is around $90.6, just one step away from the all-time high of $98 set in September. Breaking the previous bull-market high while the broader market is under pressure is not simply a matter of “rising more”; it shows that HYPE has demonstrated very clear relative strength. 💰 III. What really draws my attention: the value-return mechanism created by buybacks and burns The Hyperliquid protocol currently allocates approximately 99% of protocol fees to the Assistance Fund, which is used to continuously buy back HYPE, with some HYPE permanently removed; meanwhile, HyperEVM’s base fees and priority fees are also burned. This means: increased protocol usage → increased fees → increased buyback demand → some HYPE permanently exits circulation. This combination of “protocol revenue growth + buybacks and burns + treasury accumulation” is an important reason why I believe HYPE is worth tracking over the long term, creating a supply-and-demand mechanism worth monitoring over time. Of course, this does not mean HYPE’s supply will decline unilaterally forever; factors such as unlocks and staking rewards still require attention. 🎯 IV. The trader’s strategy: bullish over the long term, but never chase highs from the left side This is my clearest view on HYPE: bullish over the long term, but that does not mean blindly buying at the current price. • If you already have a core position: Hold the long-term core position with the trend, trade the short-term position based on the structure, and use trailing profit-taking. • If you are preparing to build a position: I still adhere to a right-side system: breakout → pullback → stabilization on declining volume → follow-up entry. The overhead supply from HYPE’s previous all-time high is relatively limited, but profit-taking pressure and round-number levels during the new-high phase still require attention. When HYPE continues to set new highs, I will not short it subjectively just because it has “risen too much”; if a major pullback occurs, I will not blindly buy the dip just because it has “fallen a lot.” I would rather wait for: a key structure to emerge → selling pressure to be exhausted → pullback confirmation → then look for right-side opportunities worth closely monitoring. What do you think of HYPE’s independent countertrend move? A. Continued treasury accumulation, targeting the $100 mark 🚀 B. Volatility increases after the new high; waiting for a pullback 📉 C. Stronger buybacks and burns; remaining bullish over the long term 💎 D. Only trade the right side; waiting for structural confirmation 🛡️ Leave A / B / C / D and share your view 👇 (The above content is compiled based on public disclosures and my personal trading system, for discussion purposes only, and does not constitute investment advice. The crypto market is extremely volatile; please make independent judgments and manage risk appropriately.)