According to @intangiblecoins, he stated during the discussion at the Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas that the Bitcoin community is gradually reaching a preliminary consensus on the threat of quantum computing.
First, most opinions believe that there should be no interference with Satoshi Nakamoto's P2PK address assets to maintain Bitcoin's core property rights; at the same time, because Satoshi Nakamoto's assets are dispersed across approximately 22,000 addresses (50 BTC per address) rather than a single large "honeypot," the actual risk of a full-scale quantum attack is lower than expected. Second, the community generally supports developing and testing post-quantum (PQ) cryptographic technologies for Bitcoin, considering them as backup plans in case of emergency, but the premise is that related work should not trigger consensus deadlock or introduce untested technical risks.
According to @intangiblecoins, he stated during the discussion at the Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas that the Bitcoin community is gradually reaching a preliminary consensus on the threat of quantum computing.
First, most opinions believe that there should be no interference with Satoshi Nakamoto's P2PK address assets to maintain Bitcoin's core property rights; at the same time, because Satoshi Nakamoto's assets are dispersed across approximately 22,000 addresses (50 BTC per address) rather than a single large "honeypot," the actual risk of a full-scale quantum attack is lower than expected.
Second, the community generally supports developing and testing post-quantum (PQ) cryptographic technologies for Bitcoin, considering them as backup plans in case of emergency, but the premise is that related work should not trigger consensus deadlock or introduce untested technical risks.