Recently, on-chain I saw those "coincidence transfers" again: A just bought, B follows right after, like there's an insider. But when I break down the paths, many are actually very simple—distributions from the same CEX hot wallet, replenishments from market-making addresses, the same group of people using the same scripts to make timed transfers, and in the end it just looks like "tacit understanding." To put it plainly, the chain won't lie, but it will make people fill in the gaps with their imagination.

These days, memes and celebrity shoutouts are heating up again, and newcomers ask me if someone is leading a team. I can only say, attention rotation is the biggest deceiver; those who chase the last leg are usually the most confident (a slight irony). I still stick to my approach: slowly add during panic, watch the chain links more than emotions during the hype, and that's it for now.