looking at this one, $XRP bounced into resistance and sellers showed up again, with 70x in play here Entry: 1.4068–1.4116 TP1: 1.3734 → TP2: 1.3438 → TP3: 1.308 Stop Loss: 1.4336 #LedgerLossesNear90Million

#GateNetInflowRanks3rd Gate’s net inflow ranked third over the past month, around $126M. Before the ranking becomes the whole conversation, here’s how I read it, and how I’d use it as a trader. 1. What this metric actually measures This kind of net inflow figure is built from on-chain tracked reserve wallets. That means it only sees the addresses an exchange has disclosed, and it measures balance changes, not “new buyers.” It also depends heavily on the time window. For context, a 30-day figure last December was over $500M and ranked first. So $126M at third tells me inflow size swings a lot with market conditions. The rank is a snapshot, not a verdict. 2. Inflow isn’t buying Money arriving on a platform can be stablecoins waiting on the sidelines, margin collateral for futures, or a simple transfer between wallets. Inflow tells me capital is nearby, not that it’s bullish. The useful question is the one the topic asks: where does it go next? 3. Where I’d look first (daily charts) My hypothesis, and it’s only a hypothesis, is that sideline capital tends to show up first where momentum is already positive. GT ~10.87: about 12% above its 50-day (9.71), RSI ~58. Resistance 11.34, support 10.53. MACD has cooled, so I’d want a hold above 10.53 before getting excited. Since GT is the platform’s own token, I also treat it with extra caution, because it can move on platform news rather than market flows. NEAR ~5.25: far above its 50-day (~3.42), RSI ~61. Resistance 5.56, support 4.30. Strong, but that gap to the average is stretched. BTC ~83,060: above its 50-day (~80,950), RSI ~52, boxed between 81,868 and 86,589. Neutral until it leaves that range. ETH ~2,508, XRP ~1.40, SOL ~109.7: RSI in the low 40s, and all three are at or under their 50-day averages. Momentum is weakest here, so I’d need a reclaim before treating them as inflow targets. 4. Why users and reserves matter, with limits The platform reports more than 60 million registered users and a 127% reserve ratio with a zero-knowledge proof-of-reserves system (company-reported, mid-August). Registered users aren’t active users, and a reserve ratio is a claim until you verify it. The good part is that users can check the proof themselves instead of trusting a headline. I’d encourage everyone to do that. My take: the number is encouraging, but I’d rather watch behavior than rank: do the inflows stay (rising reserves week after week), and do they show up in volume on the coins above? If BTC breaks 86,589 with strong volume, or GT/NEAR hold their support on pullbacks, that’s real confirmation. Without that, it’s money sitting on the sidelines. Not financial advice. Where do you think this capital goes first: BTC, GT, or a rotation into mid-caps? And what’s your confirmation signal? $GT $BTC

Wu learned that the XRP Ledger Foundation posted that the XRP supply was fixed at 100 billion when the ledger launched, and no transaction may mint additional tokens. The recent vulnerability was a way to bypass this rule and was fixed in version 3.4.1 two weeks ago. There are currently approximately 99.986 billion XRP, with the supply deflationary after transaction fees are burned. The foundation said ordinary payments would not trigger the vulnerability, which required hundreds of deliberately crafted operations. Because publicly disclosing the fix would expose the vulnerability, the community, RippleX, core developers, and validators agreed to release the patch directly. The foundation shared a build with default UNL validators, and the public binaries were released on September 25. Version 3.4.1 still requires an amendment vote and will become mandatory only after receiving support from more than 80% of validators for two consecutive weeks.