The US senators will speak about prediction markets after they banned themselves from participating in them.

This event is somewhat amusing—they themselves are the ones who banned it but still want to give opinions about it.

This includes discussions about how such betting markets should be regulated.
The whole event shows a tension between allowing innovation and protecting the public.

I'm interested in what their actual stance will be.
It seems like there is a conflict of interest, but that's what happens in politics.
What is your take—should they still weigh in?