DAO voting is truly "everyone decides together"?

To put it simply, the most dramatic proposals are never those beautiful visions, but rather how incentives are packed, who can get what, whose votes are more valuable... It seems like a discussion about the community's future, but underneath it's actually about adjusting the power structure: whether to allocate budgets to those who do the work, or to lock the discourse rights in a few addresses. Recently, the NFT royalty debate has been quite heated, which also looks similar; on the surface, it's "support creators," but on the other side, they shout "don't affect liquidity," and in the end, many plans are actually about choosing: who gets the cake first, who sets the rules. Now I always review the incentive clauses and execution rights before voting; slogans can be written casually, but once rights are handed over, it's very hard to take them back, so I try not to get too emotionally involved.