Recently, some people have been using "tags/clusters" to draw conclusions about addresses, honestly I just take it as a reference: the same group of people changing a few layers of intermediaries, using bridges, then splitting small amounts, their profile immediately becomes "retail investors"; conversely, if a hot wallet on an exchange shakes, it is immediately considered as "whale waking". I have been watching large transactions on bridges for a long time, and I increasingly feel that tags are like weather forecasts, useful but not to be taken as gospel, especially when faced with delays + cross-chain fee moments that are frustrating, judgment can easily be influenced by emotions. The turning point is that recently, with some regions increasing taxes and changing compliance trends, deposit and withdrawal expectations have become more sensitive, and fund routing will be more "circuitous", so I now prefer to observe more real flow directions and timing rhythms, rather than making quick judgments, at least for now being conservative.

شاهد النسخة الأصلية
قد تحتوي هذه الصفحة على محتوى من جهات خارجية، يتم تقديمه لأغراض إعلامية فقط (وليس كإقرارات/ضمانات)، ولا ينبغي اعتباره موافقة على آرائه من قبل Gate، ولا بمثابة نصيحة مالية أو مهنية. انظر إلى إخلاء المسؤولية للحصول على التفاصيل.
  • أعجبني
  • تعليق
  • إعادة النشر
  • مشاركة
تعليق
إضافة تعليق
إضافة تعليق
لا توجد تعليقات
  • تثبيت