Chips carry computing power, and computing power gives rise to intelligence.
Behind all of AI’s powerful capabilities is the continuous output of computing power.
Computing power is not hardware; it is productivity in the AI era.

智赢舵手 27 minutes ago

#Gate广场万圣节 $ARB Came to an abrupt halt after touching 0.14707. You can see buyers trying to support the price, but the whole situation feels like a standoff. Is this the bottom, or just a calm before the plunge? TP: 0.1585 SL: 0.1455 Market dynamics:
‍$BLESS : Current price 0.012193 - 24-hour change: +20.68%
‍$BTC : Current price 77,097.5 - 24-hour change: -4.97%

ARB+1.17%

BLESS-2.00%

BTC-0.67%

CryptoCircleBullSays an hour ago

The trend is strong, but support at higher levels matters more than the gains.
$PARTI is currently at 0.0596, not far from its 24-hour high of 0.0659. The four-hour and hourly trends are both strong, but hourly trading volume is only a little over one-tenth of its usual level, and overbought signals have already appeared. Further upside only shows that the trend is still intact; it doesn't mean those chasing the price won't get trapped at the top.
If price still can't generate decent volume near the high, can this strength still be considered a sustained trend?
My view: the trend remains stron

PARTI-1.06%

BitcoinArmyCommander 40 minutes ago

$BTC Bitcoin Price Analysis for 10.30
Bitcoin is currently in a large wave 2 sideways correction, with wave 2 unfolding in a WXY structure.
Wave Y is forming a double zigzag, with one final minor-degree decline remaining before the wave 2 correction ends.
The decline is nearing its end; consider going long near 76.
Risk warning: This is only an analysis of market structure and does not constitute any trading advice.
#BTC走势分析 #比特币走势分析

BTC-0.67%

ACaiStar 2 hours ago

Who does the index price actually follow?
You see Bitcoin’s trading price on a trading page, and next to it, an “index price.” Why aren’t the two prices exactly the same?
Because they look at different things.
The latest trade price reflects the price of the most recent trade in that market; the index price usually references multiple spot markets and is calculated using a specified method.
Think of it as buying the same product: the price a store just sold it for is that store’s transaction record; a reference value based on quotes from several stores is calculated differently.
But an index i

BTC-0.67%

LiuBeiPrince 17 minutes ago

There’s only a small sell order in the order book. Why does it never get sold out?
You’re watching the order book. At a certain price, it clearly shows just a small sell order, but after it’s filled, another one appears—as if it will never run out. What’s going on?
One possibility is that someone is using an iceberg order.
It splits a larger trading order into smaller orders, displaying and executing them in batches. What you see is only the portion exposed at that moment, like the tip of an iceberg above water.
For example, suppose someone plans to sell 100 coins but submits only 5 to the ord

MeaninglessGwei an hour ago

Jin keeps talking up semiconductor stocks every day and has finally been caught red-handed
Unfortunately, this person named hanzhong has even blocked me
He turns out to be a paid follower of Jin. He really should come check out our group and learn what it means to quit gambling and invest for the long term
Maybe it’s because I’ve recently criticized herman jin for going long without holding any positions,
and herman jin has taken sarcastic shots at me several times, so his followers all blocked me
As a result, over the past two months, this hanzhong hasn’t seen any of my bearish comments
Being

INTC-3.60%

LiuBeiPrince an hour ago

Why can't your own buy and sell orders match?
You place a sell order first, then submit a buy order. The prices clearly match, but one of the orders gets canceled. Why?
One possibility is that “self-trade protection,” or STP, was triggered.
This means that when the system detects a buy order about to match with a sell order within the same user scope, it blocks the trade according to its rules.
It’s like selling from your left hand to your right: it looks like a trade, but ownership hasn’t actually changed. This kind of trade could also create misleading trading volume.
Depending on the rules,

MOLLAJATTan hour agoBullish

$US30 ‌US30 (Dow Jones)
🏢 Why did the Dow Jones see a therapist? It couldn't cope with the pressure of recovering from its own dip! 📉📈
Bias: V-shaped recovery. Price fell to 52,182, then forcefully reclaimed the daily open (52,347) and is now testing today's high. A breakout or a modest pullback may follow. 🔥
---
🟢 Spot Buy 1 – Pullback (Best risk/reward)
Entry Zone: 52,300 – 52,350 (Confluence: Today's open + psychological support)
TP1: 52,450
TP2: 52,650
TP3: 52,837 (Local peak)
SL: 52,200 (Below the recent swing low)
🟢 Spot Buy 2 – Breakout (Momentum)
Entry Zone: 52,405 – 52,450 (Br

US30-0.14%

GOOGL-12.86%

CryptoCircleBullSays 21 minutes ago

Nvidia is reportedly in talks with Nscale about guaranteeing credit for data centers. The campus will deploy Nvidia chips for use by Anthropic. Nscale is also preparing for an IPO, but some investors oppose its $30 billion valuation.
Jensen Huang is pushing it to work around the clock, and Nvidia may even have to backstop the bills. The shovel seller is now helping finance the mine, while the market is still nitpicking over the valuation.
$BTC

NVDA-0.77%

BTC-0.67%

LiuBang an hour ago

Why Can’t Your Own Buy and Sell Orders Match?
You first place a sell order, then submit a buy order. The prices clearly match, but one of the orders gets canceled. Why?
One possibility is that “self-trade prevention,” or STP, was triggered.
This means that when the system detects a buy order about to match with a sell order within the same user scope, it prevents you from trading with yourself according to its rules.
It’s like selling from your left hand to your right: it may look like a trade took place, but ownership hasn’t actually changed. Such trades could also create misleading trading v

TraderOno 2 hours ago

10.30 $XAUUSD Market outlook
As assessed yesterday, the current 4-hour chart is in a downtrend, and the 1-hour chart already touched the rebound high yesterday. Watch price action in more detail on the 15-minute timeframe.
If there are no signs of sustained strength and structural improvement, focus next on the 45-minute and 1-hour timeframes to see whether price comes under pressure and pulls back again.
Long setup:
If the price holds above the area near the previous low of 3975 and selling pressure eases, consider trying a dip-buying trade. The first target is the 4-hour consolidation zone.

XAUUSD-0.37%

Ronaldo078 hours ago

The Fed holds rates steady, and Waller denies political interference! Policy schedule reforms are al

LIVE1,626

TheLongWindIsLeadingTheOrder an hour agoBearish

I said in the chat this morning: $ETH ETH broke below the daily EMA20 here, and the rebound is being firmly capped by the MA5. A breakdown gives the bears a tailwind.
200x short position, unrealized profit of 976.32%, down 5.6%. It may not look like much of a drop, but at 200x leverage, that translates to nearly 10x returns. ETH is stalling at elevated levels, volume is shrinking, and the rebound can't even reach the trendline. Once it broke down, I entered—the cascade is pushing prices lower on its own.
But honestly, 200x leverage is like licking blood off a knife's edge; there's only a 0.5%

ETH-1.23%

BTC-0.65%

UchihaUltraShort an hour ago

I react quickly. Even with 40x leverage, sticking to the plan and using a 5% position is fine; you can keep adding along the way. Don’t panic—it’ll go down to 1,800 at most. The hackers have $5 billion in total, and according to the official report, they currently have $3 billion worth of ETH to sell, so the price will probably reach around that level. With a 5% position, the liquidation price is in the 1,000s, so it’s absolutely fine—just keep adding all the way down

ETH-1.23%

LIUUR 17 minutes ago

The Fed Holds Rates Steady: A “No-Move” Blind Date, but Two Hardcore Guests Want to “Flip the Table”
Attention, everyone watching the drama unfold: the “annual gala of the global financial world” across the ocean—the Fed’s policy meeting—has kicked off a new season. This time, the finale can be summed up perfectly: same rate as before!
That’s right, the Fed officially announced that it would keep interest rates unchanged.
It’s like spotting a coat you like at the mall, only to gasp at the price tag. You stand at the counter, running your hand over it again and again, thinking, “It’s too expens