On-chain, those "coincidental transfers" are probably not mysticism; when broken down, you can usually find a logical path: who first withdraws from the exchange, which intermediary wallet it goes into, then splits into several addresses, and finally lands in staking contracts or loops back again. Recently, everyone has been anxious about staking unlocks and token unlock calendars, which has started to create selling pressure; I also first check whether the same batch of addresses is moving positions in advance, rather than jumping to conclusions that a large transfer means "a crash is coming." To put it simply, on-chain activity is more like a logistics sheet, not an emotional chart; once the path is clarified, the mindset becomes more stable... As someone who does miscellaneous tasks, I prefer to follow multiple clues rather than be scared by my own imagination.

Voir l'original
Cette page peut inclure du contenu de tiers fourni à des fins d'information uniquement. Gate ne garantit ni l'exactitude ni la validité de ces contenus, n’endosse pas les opinions exprimées, et ne fournit aucun conseil financier ou professionnel à travers ces informations. Voir la section Avertissement pour plus de détails.
  • Récompense
  • Commentaire
  • Reposter
  • Partager
Commentaire
Ajouter un commentaire
Ajouter un commentaire
Aucun commentaire
  • Épingler