📢 Gate 广场认证创作者招募中,入驻瓜分每月 $20,000 创作大奖!
📌 参与方式
站内创作者: 成功申请“创作者认证徽章”即可自动参与。
新入驻创作者: 需填写入驻表单申请 👉️ https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7698
🎁 创作者福利
1️⃣ 首帖见面礼: 新入驻/回归创作者发首帖,即得 $50U 奖励!
2️⃣ 周度发帖奖: 完成周发帖任务,轻松瓜分 $10,000 奖池!
3️⃣ 月度创作奖: 赛道更多样,完成月度任务瓜分 $1,600 GT 奖池!
4️⃣ 专属推广任务:进入专属创作者社群,享专属推广任务和节日礼包!
让您的优质内容被更多人看到,携手共建高质量创作者社区!
活动细节:https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/51536
BTC and ETH price movements are volatile frequently.
I discovered something - when analyzing the same market issue with AI twice at different times, the judgments weren't completely consistent.
After reviewing the call logs, I found the problem was on my end.
Previously, I routed all requests through the strongest model uniformly, to save effort and felt it was more stable.
This caused higher latency during high-frequency periods, output stability decreased, and calling costs increased significantly.
For powerful models like GPT and Gemini, frequent daily calls aren't cheap, and sometimes the returns don't even cover the costs.
I changed the logic to a tiered structure - simple questions use lightweight models, complex questions use strong models.
Manually maintaining this traffic distribution ruleset is draining, and debugging time exceeded the trading itself.
I started using a unified model entry point, letting the system automatically distribute based on task complexity.
GateRouter launched by Gate enables calling all models with one API, which is a multi-model routing architecture that can automatically select the most suitable model as needed.
Results are more stable, latency decreased, and overall costs dropped significantly.
Struggling over which model to choose,
might as well let the system complete model selection automatically.