购买 SolanaSOL

便捷购买Solana,跟随我们的步骤指南。
预估报价
1 SOL0.00 USD
Solana
SOL
Solana
$75.81
+2.16%
扫描 QR 码 下载 Gate App

如何使用 USD 购买 Solana (SOL)?

请输入金额
选择SOL/USD交易对,然后输入购买金额。
确认订单
查看交易详细信息,包括SOL/USD价格,费用和其他说明,确认后,提交订单。
接收Solana(SOL)
付款成功后,购买的SOL将自动存入您的 Gate.com 钱包。

如何使用银行卡/信用卡购买 Solana (SOL)?

  • 1
    注册并完成身份验证 要购买SOL并确保交易安全,先注册 Gate.com 账户并完成 KYC 身份验证,保障您的资产安全。
  • 2
    选择SOL和支付方式进入“购买Solana(SOL)”版块,选择SOL,输入您购买的金额,并选择银行卡/信用卡作为付款方式,然后填写银行卡信息。
  • 3
    立即接收SOL确认订单后,您购买的SOL将即时、安全地存入您的 Gate.com 钱包,可随时用于交易、持有或转账。

为什么购买Solana(SOL)?

什么是Solana?——高TPS与低手续费的新一代公链
Solana(SOL)于2017年创立,2020年主网正式上线,以极高的交易处理速度(每秒数千笔TPS)和超低手续费著称。Solana采用独特的历史证明(Proof of History,PoH)结合权益证明(PoS)共识机制,大幅提升了网络吞吐量并减少延迟。
技术创新与生态发展
Solana的PoH时间戳机制可自动排序事件,提高整体效率。PoS则根据质押SOL数量选出验证者,兼顾安全性与节能效果。Solana生态系统快速扩张,已吸引超过500个DApp项目,涵盖DeFi、NFT、GameFi等热门领域。Phantom钱包等应用用户数激增,TVL(锁仓价值)一年内从1亿美元跃升至百亿美元级别。
SOL代币用途与网络治理
SOL代币用于支付交易手续费、质押奖励、参与链上治理以及驱动智能合约运行。用户可以质押SOL协助维护网络安全并获得收益,也可参与社区提案投票。
挑战与风险
Solana曾多次发生网络中断和安全漏洞,稳定性与去中心化程度受到一定质疑。以太坊、Avalanche等竞争公链持续创新,生态项目淘汰率较高。SOL价格波动较大,投资需保持谨慎。
投资Solana的理由与风险
高性能与低手续费:适合大规模DApp和即时交易需求。 生态快速成长:DeFi、NFT、GameFi等多元应用加速扩展。 技术与安全风险:网络稳定性有待加强,安全事件需持续关注。 竞争激烈:新兴公链及Layer 2方案不断涌现。
怀疑者观点与替代思考
Solana虽然具备高性能优势,但如果无法彻底解决网络中断和安全问题,长期竞争力仍存隐忧。投资者应密切关注技术进展和生态发展。

SolanaSOL 今日价格和市场趋势

SOL/USD
Solana
$75.81
+2.16%
行情
热度
市值
#9
$44.13B
交易量
流通量
$33.66M
582.16M

截至目前,Solana(SOL)的价格为$75.81。流通供应量约为 582,166,254.11 SOL,总市值为 $582.16M,当前市值排名:9。

在过去的 24 小时里,Solana的交易量达到了$33.66M,与前一天相比增加了+2.16%。在过去一周里,Solana的价格跃升至+3.95%,这反映了人们对SOL作为数字黄金和对冲通胀的工具的持续需求。

此外,Solana的历史最高点是$293.31。市场波动仍然很大,因此投资者应密切关注宏观经济趋势和监管动态。

SolanaSOL 与其他加密货币比较

SOL VS
SOL
价位
24小时涨跌幅
7日涨跌幅
24小时成交额
市值
市场排名
流通供应量

购买Solana(SOL) 之后可以做什么?

现货交易
利用Gate.com丰富的交易对,随时买卖SOL,抓住市场波动机会,实现资产增值。
余币宝
使用闲置的SOL申购平台的活期/定期理财产品,轻松赚取额外收益。
兑换
快速将SOL兑换成其他加密资产。

通过Gate购买Solana的好处

有 3,500 种加密货币供您选择
自2013年以来,始终是十大CEX之一
自2020年5月以来100%储备证明
即时存款和取款的高效交易

Gate 上提供的其他加密货币

了解更多关于Solana(SOL)的信息

Solana Staking Simplified: A Complete Guide to SOL Staking
Beginner
Introduction to Raydium
Intermediate
Jump Trading And Its Portfolio
Beginner
更多SOL文章
恐慌指数 28 意味着什么?SOL 与 XRP 同步承压下的市场情绪解读
SOL报73.28美元、XRP报1.07美元,恐惧与贪婪指数回落至28。本文基于历史数据回测恐惧区间的BTC后市表现,分析当前市场情绪的结构性含义。
从 BTC 到 SOL:摩根士丹利质押型 ETP 如何重塑机构加密配置版图?
摩根士丹利于 NYSE Arca 推出以太坊与 Solana 质押 ETP,费率 0.14%,质押收益 95% 透传股东。
DRV 冲高回落:Derive 机构扩张与代币回购能否重塑估值逻辑?
Derive(DRV)近期冲高后回落,协议层面回购比例提升至 35%、质押排放削减、SOL 与 XAUT 期权上线等动作密集落地。本文从代币供需、机构进展与竞争格局三个维度,拆解 DRV 估值逻辑的支撑与压力。
更多SOL博客
What Is a Phantom Wallet: A Guide for Solana Users in 2025
In 2025, Phantom wallet has revolutionized the Web3 landscape, emerging as a top Solana wallet and multi-chain powerhouse. With advanced security features and seamless integration across networks, Phantom offers unparalleled convenience for managing digital assets. Discover why millions choose this versatile solution over competitors like MetaMask for their crypto journey.
How Does Solana's Proof of History Work?
Solana's Proof of History (PoH) is a unique consensus mechanism that significantly enhances the speed and efficiency of the Solana blockchain. Here’s a detailed explanation of how PoH works and its impact on Solana’s performance:
Is Solana a Good Investment?
Investing in Solana (SOL) can be a promising opportunity, but it also comes with inherent risks due to the volatile nature of the cryptocurrency market. Here’s a comprehensive analysis based on recent market performance, expert opinions, and future predictions:
更多SOL Wiki

关于Solana(SOL)的最新消息

2026-08-09 03:57Gate News
Solana 上的永续合约去中心化交易所 FlashTrade 将于 8 月 9 日关闭;创始人称,原因是内部冲突。
2026-08-09 02:18Gate News
一名巨鲸计划使用 20 倍杠杆做多 3,793 万枚 SOL,目前已在 Hyperliquid 上完成一半仓位的建仓。
2026-08-09 01:41Gate News
Solana Meme 币 TOAD 一夜之间市值达到 $20M ,随后回落至 1200 万美元。
2026-08-09 00:23Gate News
某地址执行 50 万 SOL 分时委托买入订单,18.6 万 SOL 已成交,平均价格为 76 美元
2026-08-08 23:59Gate News
Solana OG 攻击者将价值 439 万美元的 ETH 转入 Tornado Cash
更多 SOL 新闻
#StockTradingShareChallenge  
#股票交易分享挑战  
#TradingStrategy  
𝗠𝗬 𝟱-𝗔𝗦𝗦𝗘𝗧 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗠𝗔𝗣: 𝗟𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗟𝗦 𝗙𝗜𝗥𝗦𝗧, 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘𝗦 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗗
I’m not trying to predict every candle.
I’m building scenarios.
For me, the objective is simple: know where buyers may defend, where sellers may take control, and exactly what would invalidate my setup before risking capital.
$BTC  ‌
𝗕𝗧𝗖 — ~$64,700
BTC remains the market’s main compass.
Support: $64K
Major support: $61K–$60K
Resistance: $66K–$67K
Targets: $68.5K → $70K
𝗕𝗨𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗛 𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗚𝗚𝗘𝗥: Hold $64K, reclaim $66K and confirm the breakout → $67K, then potentially $68.5K–$70K.
𝗕𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗛 𝗦𝗜𝗚𝗡𝗔𝗟: Lose $64K decisively → reduce exposure and watch $61K–$60K.
I prefer breakout + retest confirmation rather than chasing an extended candle.
$ETH  ‌
𝗘𝗧𝗛 — ~$1,850
Support: $1,800
Resistance: $1,900–$2,000
Targets: $2,100 → $2,200
ETH needs to reclaim $1,900 first.
A sustained move above $2,000 would strengthen the bullish structure and put $2,100–$2,200 on the radar.
Below $1,800, I would rather wait for a new base than force a long.
BTC remains the key confirmation signal.
$SOL  ‌
𝗦𝗢𝗟 — ~$80
Support: $75
Resistance: $85–$90
Targets: $95 → $100
SOL offers higher volatility, which means position sizing becomes even more important.
My preferred setup: reclaim $85 → confirm → establish $90 as support.
If that happens, $95 and the psychological $100 level become the next areas to monitor.
A sustained loss of $75 would invalidate the bullish setup for me.
$XRP  ‌
𝗫𝗥𝗣 — ~$1.25
Support: $1.20
Resistance: $1.30–$1.40
Targets: $1.50 → $1.60
The first hurdle is $1.30.
A confirmed break and hold above $1.40 could create room toward $1.50–$1.60.
Lose $1.20, and I switch defensive.
XRP is one where confirmation matters more than anticipation—false breakouts can punish impatient entries.
$BNB  ‌
𝗕𝗡𝗕 — ~$610
Support: $600
Resistance: $630–$650
Targets: $680 → $700
BNB needs to reclaim $630 and then prove strength above $650.
A confirmed $650 breakout could open the route toward $680 and potentially $700.
Below $600, risk comes first. No emotional averaging down.
𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗠𝗔𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗥 𝗙𝗜𝗟𝗧𝗘𝗥: 𝗕𝗜𝗧𝗖𝗢𝗜𝗡
My altcoin decisions start with BTC.
If BTC holds $64K and breaks $66K–$67K with confirmation, I become more constructive on ETH, SOL, XRP and BNB.
If BTC loses $64K, I become more defensive across the board.
𝗠𝗬 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗥𝗨𝗟𝗘𝗦
1️⃣ Mark the levels.
2️⃣ Wait for confirmation.
3️⃣ Define invalidation before entry.
4️⃣ Demand a sensible risk/reward setup.
5️⃣ Take profits according to the plan.
6️⃣ Never let FOMO determine position size.
7️⃣ Exit or reassess when market structure changes.
These are scenarios—not guaranteed predictions.
Markets can invalidate even the strongest setup.
The goal of this challenge is not to show the biggest winning trade. It is to show the process behind a trade.
𝗖𝗔𝗣𝗜𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗣𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗩𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 → 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗬 → 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗙𝗜𝗧
That order matters.
𝗗𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁.
𝗟𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘀𝗲𝘁𝘂𝗽.
[@Gate_Square](gt://mention/UlVAVVpbAwsO0O0O)  
#StockTradingShareChallenge
SoominStar
2026-08-09 07:13
#StockTradingShareChallenge #股票交易分享挑战 #TradingStrategy 𝗠𝗬 𝟱-𝗔𝗦𝗦𝗘𝗧 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗠𝗔𝗣: 𝗟𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗟𝗦 𝗙𝗜𝗥𝗦𝗧, 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘𝗦 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗗 I’m not trying to predict every candle. I’m building scenarios. For me, the objective is simple: know where buyers may defend, where sellers may take control, and exactly what would invalidate my setup before risking capital. $BTC ‌ 𝗕𝗧𝗖 — ~$64,700 BTC remains the market’s main compass. Support: $64K Major support: $61K–$60K Resistance: $66K–$67K Targets: $68.5K → $70K 𝗕𝗨𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗛 𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗚𝗚𝗘𝗥: Hold $64K, reclaim $66K and confirm the breakout → $67K, then potentially $68.5K–$70K. 𝗕𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗛 𝗦𝗜𝗚𝗡𝗔𝗟: Lose $64K decisively → reduce exposure and watch $61K–$60K. I prefer breakout + retest confirmation rather than chasing an extended candle. $ETH ‌ 𝗘𝗧𝗛 — ~$1,850 Support: $1,800 Resistance: $1,900–$2,000 Targets: $2,100 → $2,200 ETH needs to reclaim $1,900 first. A sustained move above $2,000 would strengthen the bullish structure and put $2,100–$2,200 on the radar. Below $1,800, I would rather wait for a new base than force a long. BTC remains the key confirmation signal. $SOL ‌ 𝗦𝗢𝗟 — ~$80 Support: $75 Resistance: $85–$90 Targets: $95 → $100 SOL offers higher volatility, which means position sizing becomes even more important. My preferred setup: reclaim $85 → confirm → establish $90 as support. If that happens, $95 and the psychological $100 level become the next areas to monitor. A sustained loss of $75 would invalidate the bullish setup for me. $XRP ‌ 𝗫𝗥𝗣 — ~$1.25 Support: $1.20 Resistance: $1.30–$1.40 Targets: $1.50 → $1.60 The first hurdle is $1.30. A confirmed break and hold above $1.40 could create room toward $1.50–$1.60. Lose $1.20, and I switch defensive. XRP is one where confirmation matters more than anticipation—false breakouts can punish impatient entries. $BNB ‌ 𝗕𝗡𝗕 — ~$610 Support: $600 Resistance: $630–$650 Targets: $680 → $700 BNB needs to reclaim $630 and then prove strength above $650. A confirmed $650 breakout could open the route toward $680 and potentially $700. Below $600, risk comes first. No emotional averaging down. 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗠𝗔𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗥 𝗙𝗜𝗟𝗧𝗘𝗥: 𝗕𝗜𝗧𝗖𝗢𝗜𝗡 My altcoin decisions start with BTC. If BTC holds $64K and breaks $66K–$67K with confirmation, I become more constructive on ETH, SOL, XRP and BNB. If BTC loses $64K, I become more defensive across the board. 𝗠𝗬 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗥𝗨𝗟𝗘𝗦 1️⃣ Mark the levels. 2️⃣ Wait for confirmation. 3️⃣ Define invalidation before entry. 4️⃣ Demand a sensible risk/reward setup. 5️⃣ Take profits according to the plan. 6️⃣ Never let FOMO determine position size. 7️⃣ Exit or reassess when market structure changes. These are scenarios—not guaranteed predictions. Markets can invalidate even the strongest setup. The goal of this challenge is not to show the biggest winning trade. It is to show the process behind a trade. 𝗖𝗔𝗣𝗜𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗣𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗩𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 → 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗬 → 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗙𝗜𝗧 That order matters. 𝗗𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁. 𝗟𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘀𝗲𝘁𝘂𝗽. [@Gate_Square](gt://mention/UlVAVVpbAwsO0O0O) #StockTradingShareChallenge
BTC
-0.23%
ETH
+0.14%
SOL
+2.14%
XRP
+0.68%
BNB
+1.49%
$SOL  / USDT — LONG SETUP
SOL is showing signs of a potential reversal after bouncing sharply from the 70.51 low.
Entry: 74.00 – 76.40
TP1: 78.50
TP2: 80.50
TP3: 83.00
SL: 71.50
Price has reclaimed MA(7) and MA(25), while rising volume supports the bullish move. A sustained break above the entry zone could open the way toward the higher targets.
#NFPShockSpikesRateCutOdds
VANYA
2026-08-09 06:09
$SOL / USDT — LONG SETUP SOL is showing signs of a potential reversal after bouncing sharply from the 70.51 low. Entry: 74.00 – 76.40 TP1: 78.50 TP2: 80.50 TP3: 83.00 SL: 71.50 Price has reclaimed MA(7) and MA(25), while rising volume supports the bullish move. A sustained break above the entry zone could open the way toward the higher targets. #NFPShockSpikesRateCutOdds
SOL
+2.14%
BIP-110 Split Farce Comes to an End: A High-Profile “Bitcoin Fork” Ultimately Became an Ignored Orphan Chain
August 8, early morning.
Bitcoin block height 961,632.
A small number of nodes decided to leave the mainnet and implement the BIP-110 rules.
The media began hyping it: “Bitcoin has split in two!”
Are you panicking?
Don’t. Let’s see how this “forked chain” is doing now—
While the Bitcoin main chain had advanced to block 961,651, the BIP-110 fork chain had mined only two blocks, remaining at 961,633.
It was 18 to 20 blocks behind the main chain.
And the gap is still growing.
This fork farce, portrayed as “the biggest governance crisis in Bitcoin’s history,” went from launch to complete irrelevance in less than 48 hours.
Let’s go through it from the beginning.
In December 2025, a developer using the pseudonym Dathon Ohm proposed BIP-110. Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr provided the original draft proposal.
The proposal: Restrict the inclusion of non-financial data such as Ordinals inscriptions in Bitcoin blocks within one year.
Supporters said: Inscriptions are “spam transactions” that consume block space and drive up fees; Bitcoin should focus on being money.
Sounds pretty reasonable, right?
But the problem is—nobody agreed.
Let’s see how this turned into a “farce.”
In July, Michael Saylor published a 10,000-word article listing 110 reasons for opposition. He said BIP-110 was an “iatrogenic proposal for Bitcoin”—a treatment that could cause new harm.
That same month, Blockstream CEO Adam Back directly lashed out, calling it “Idiocracy.” He said the essence of BIP-110 was an attempt to constrain others’ behavior through the consensus layer, which runs completely counter to Bitcoin’s core attributes of decentralization and permissionlessness.
On August 4, Saylor publicly refused to support it, citing a miner support rate of only 2.7% and saying the 55% threshold was “mathematically impossible to reach.”
On August 8, at block 961,632, the fork occurred.
And then?
Then nothing happened.
Data showed that BIP-110 miner signaling support fluctuated between just 0.3% and 2.6%.
No major mining pool publicly supported it. Foundry, AntPool, F2Pool, ViaBTC—all remained silent.
Over the past two weeks, only 2.53% of blocks signaled support.
The 55% threshold? It did not even come close.
The nodes supporting BIP-110 mainly came from users running Bitcoin Knots. The only mining pool to publicly support BIP-110 was Ocean, owned by Luke Dashjr.
One mining pool holding up an entire chain.
Even more absurdly—this fork lacked even basic security protection.
Ledger issued a warning: BIP-110 has no built-in replay protection.
What does that mean?
If you recklessly transfer or trade assets on the fork chain, the real BTC on the main chain could also be transferred away.
Developer Kevin Loaec also warned that selling the forked coins could result in real BTC being stolen.
A forked chain that cannot even guarantee security—and you’re telling me this is “the future of Bitcoin”?
Here’s the painful truth—
BIP-110 went from a “groundbreaking proposal” to being ignored in just 8 months.
Even at its peak, support was below 3%.
A high-profile “Bitcoin fork crisis” ultimately ended with virtually zero support.
Bitcoin was not “split in two”; on the contrary, this proved its ability to “remain united.”
This shows that Bitcoin’s governance mechanism is more robust than anyone imagined.
The dual thresholds of miner signaling and community consensus worked perfectly in this incident.
What is the outcome when a proposal without broad support forcibly forks?
An orphan chain 20 blocks behind the main chain, with only two blocks, that could stop producing blocks at any time.
Because Bitcoin’s difficulty adjustment mechanism depends on stable hashing power, when a minority chain loses sufficient miner support, block generation times can stretch from 10 minutes to several hours or even several days.
This is not a fork. It is a slow death.
Bitcoin was not “split in two”; on the contrary, this proved its ability to “remain united.”#非农爆雷降息预期逆转 #周末行情分析 #CLARITY法案投票窗口即将关闭 $BTC $ETH $SOL
Mining_sLittleSheep
2026-08-09 05:35
BIP-110 Split Farce Comes to an End: A High-Profile “Bitcoin Fork” Ultimately Became an Ignored Orphan Chain August 8, early morning. Bitcoin block height 961,632. A small number of nodes decided to leave the mainnet and implement the BIP-110 rules. The media began hyping it: “Bitcoin has split in two!” Are you panicking? Don’t. Let’s see how this “forked chain” is doing now— While the Bitcoin main chain had advanced to block 961,651, the BIP-110 fork chain had mined only two blocks, remaining at 961,633. It was 18 to 20 blocks behind the main chain. And the gap is still growing. This fork farce, portrayed as “the biggest governance crisis in Bitcoin’s history,” went from launch to complete irrelevance in less than 48 hours. Let’s go through it from the beginning. In December 2025, a developer using the pseudonym Dathon Ohm proposed BIP-110. Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr provided the original draft proposal. The proposal: Restrict the inclusion of non-financial data such as Ordinals inscriptions in Bitcoin blocks within one year. Supporters said: Inscriptions are “spam transactions” that consume block space and drive up fees; Bitcoin should focus on being money. Sounds pretty reasonable, right? But the problem is—nobody agreed. Let’s see how this turned into a “farce.” In July, Michael Saylor published a 10,000-word article listing 110 reasons for opposition. He said BIP-110 was an “iatrogenic proposal for Bitcoin”—a treatment that could cause new harm. That same month, Blockstream CEO Adam Back directly lashed out, calling it “Idiocracy.” He said the essence of BIP-110 was an attempt to constrain others’ behavior through the consensus layer, which runs completely counter to Bitcoin’s core attributes of decentralization and permissionlessness. On August 4, Saylor publicly refused to support it, citing a miner support rate of only 2.7% and saying the 55% threshold was “mathematically impossible to reach.” On August 8, at block 961,632, the fork occurred. And then? Then nothing happened. Data showed that BIP-110 miner signaling support fluctuated between just 0.3% and 2.6%. No major mining pool publicly supported it. Foundry, AntPool, F2Pool, ViaBTC—all remained silent. Over the past two weeks, only 2.53% of blocks signaled support. The 55% threshold? It did not even come close. The nodes supporting BIP-110 mainly came from users running Bitcoin Knots. The only mining pool to publicly support BIP-110 was Ocean, owned by Luke Dashjr. One mining pool holding up an entire chain. Even more absurdly—this fork lacked even basic security protection. Ledger issued a warning: BIP-110 has no built-in replay protection. What does that mean? If you recklessly transfer or trade assets on the fork chain, the real BTC on the main chain could also be transferred away. Developer Kevin Loaec also warned that selling the forked coins could result in real BTC being stolen. A forked chain that cannot even guarantee security—and you’re telling me this is “the future of Bitcoin”? Here’s the painful truth— BIP-110 went from a “groundbreaking proposal” to being ignored in just 8 months. Even at its peak, support was below 3%. A high-profile “Bitcoin fork crisis” ultimately ended with virtually zero support. Bitcoin was not “split in two”; on the contrary, this proved its ability to “remain united.” This shows that Bitcoin’s governance mechanism is more robust than anyone imagined. The dual thresholds of miner signaling and community consensus worked perfectly in this incident. What is the outcome when a proposal without broad support forcibly forks? An orphan chain 20 blocks behind the main chain, with only two blocks, that could stop producing blocks at any time. Because Bitcoin’s difficulty adjustment mechanism depends on stable hashing power, when a minority chain loses sufficient miner support, block generation times can stretch from 10 minutes to several hours or even several days. This is not a fork. It is a slow death. Bitcoin was not “split in two”; on the contrary, this proved its ability to “remain united.”#非农爆雷降息预期逆转 #周末行情分析 #CLARITY法案投票窗口即将关闭 $BTC $ETH $SOL
BTC
-0.23%
ETH
+0.14%
SOL
+2.14%
更多 SOL 帖子

关于购买Solana(SOL)的常见问题

常见问题回复由人工智能生成,仅供参考。请仔细评估内容。
在哪里买Solana(SOL)最安全?
x
如何在 Gate.com 上安全购买Solana(SOL)?
x
Solana(SOL)会涨到 $1000 美元吗?
x
现在是购买 Solana(SOL)的好时机吗?
x
我可以用比特币购买 Solana 吗?
x