Added a small patch to restore the LST interactions that were previously missed. Honestly, the yields from these restaking protocols look pretty tempting, but once you think about it, they feel flimsy—stake ETH to get LST, then throw the LST into some pool for another layer of yield. Is the yield actually from fees or from someone else’s principal? Sometimes even the project team can’t figure it out. Lately I keep seeing people link ETF inflows and U.S. stock-market risk appetite to crypto prices. I’m just an airdrop farmer, so I’ll take the macro narrative with a grain of salt. My ETH is locked in LSTs and can’t be moved anyway, so I’ll just let the price swings play out for now. When it comes to risk, I’m only aiming to “be able to claim.” Whether the protocol gets hacked and the staked assets are drained, or governance screws up and triggers slashing, those are risks I can’t patch myself. I can only pick protocols with plenty of audits and deep TVL, and throw in a little money. Put simply, it’s still about trading speed for odds; thinking too much about the rest just gives me a headache.

$ETH If only it could return to 2800.

#以太坊# Bitcoin: BTC and ETH are currently pulling back after rallying to highs on the weekly chart, with clearly insufficient upward momentum. They will most likely head south next.