Share your thoughts
placeholder
Article
Why the CLARITY Act Failed at 49-50 The 60-Vote Hurdle and What It Really Means for Crypto
The vote everyone on Gate Square was waiting for just happened. At 02 15 UTC+8 on Sept 16, the US Senate held the key procedural vote (cloture) on the CLARITY Act and it failed to advance.
Official result 49 Yes - 50 No. It needed 60 votes. This confirms what Kalshi prediction market was pricing - the probability of passage this year had fallen to 25%.
Why was this bill so important and why did it fail? Let's go beyond the headlines.
1. What Would the CLARITY Act Actually Do?
Known as H R 3633, the Digit
post-image
BTC-3.92%
ETH-5.77%
COIN-0.72%
  • 3
I’m handling this short position on an 80/20 basis: taking most of the profit off the table first and watching for continuation with the remaining 20%. $AAVE faced repeated pressure at the key level, failed to hold the breakout, and then confirmed weakness on the retest, so I took a bearish position. There was a rebound while holding, but price failed to reclaim the key level, and the protection level remained unchanged.
I’m currently up +321.84%, and I don’t plan to gamble all the profits on an acceleration phase. As long as the previous low holds and price quickly recovers, the bearish outl
post-image
AAVE-6.05%
XRP-11.01%
ETH-5.85%
LATEST: 🇺🇸 Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse says he still sees "reason for optimism" after the CLARITY Act failed its cloture vote, as SEC and CFTC are set to fill the legislative gap through rulemaking.
#CLARITYActKeyVoteAhead
##FedAnnounceRateDecisionSoon
  • 6
  • 1
Holding a short position isn’t about making predictions—it’s about having an invalidation level. $ZHIPU When setting up earlier in this move, I focused on key levels weakening and rebounds coming on lower volume, so I never changed my bearish outlook.
After breaking below the key level, the price retested it but failed to reclaim it, showing that selling pressure remains. I took profits in batches as planned, locked in 80%, and kept only a small remainder to run.
The Bollinger Bands are now opening downward, and there may be support near the previous low. As long as the rebound fails to recla
post-image
ZHIPU-10.14%
SNDK-1.79%
DOGE-5.34%
Event Market Double Rewards: Earn Up to 202 USDT Cash per ...
2026-09-07 09:30:00-2026-09-17
09:30:00 (UTC+8)$GT
https://www.gate.com/share/act/575b1ba7
GT-2.25%
  • 4
  • 1
$CAP This long position didn’t add immediately after entry; I first wanted to see whether CAP could hold above the previous high. Support on the pullback was stronger than expected, and the fake breakout didn’t damage the structure, so I continued holding.

After securing +14.92%, I handled it on a 70/30 basis: took 70% off first, and moved the protection level up for the remaining 30% so I wouldn’t give all the profit back. If it comes under pressure again around 0.05987, I’ll reduce a bit more.

I’m now leaning toward a bullish pullback, with clear conditions: as long as the 0.05941 area h
post-image
CAP-5.38%
ZEC-4.63%
SNDK-1.79%
Solana apps booked almost $8 million in a single day.
September 11 came in at $7.94 million on Blockworks. That is the strongest daily print since October 2025, and it follows a $5.09 million session the day before. The tape did not drift higher. It jumped.
The stack inside that bar also changed. stonkfun led with $2.48 million. $PUMP followed at $1.10 million. fomo and Axiom each cleared about $627k. Collector Crypt and Meteora sat near $500k. Jupiter, the large DEX name, was further back at $381k.
So the revenue is still coming from launchpads and trading tools. It is not coming from lending
post-image
SOL-6.08%
PUMP-3.63%
MET-11.49%
JUP-10.16%
cant unsee charts
post-image
Crypto Market update
live-cover
LIVE10
I didn’t get greedy for the final leg of the $FF short. After securing +692.64%, I handled it on an 80/20 basis: I took profit on 80% first and kept 20% to see whether it could remain under pressure. I won’t chase a short at this level; I’ll only manage the existing position.
After entry, the chart showed a pullback following a false breakout at the highs. Selling pressure was evident near the previous high, while the retest lacked strong support. The price is trading below the key level at 0.1411, so bears have the temporary upper hand, but I won’t mistake consolidation for a one-way move. Vo
post-image
FF+9.88%
LAB-3.87%
SNDK-1.79%
Now you need to wish me luck!
Clarity act my ass!
Send this higher, bitcoin:native
post-image
BTC-3.92%
BTC BOLD MOVES
live-cover
LIVE1,067
Almost reaching “Extreme Fear” territories on the Fear and Greed Index.
Rate Hike could already be priced in.
post-image
Bitcoin Puppets 🌎☮️
post-image
BTC-3.70%
Yeah sure, name your company BJ's RAW, why not, nothing matters
post-image
With the same 1,000U, some doubled their money on $Lobster today, while others are still playing dead in other coins. The showdown is on.
First, let's review the market. $Lobster is currently priced at 0.1932, up 21.57% over 24 hours, with a high of 0.1957 and a low of 0.1519, and a trading volume of 211.2M. Pay attention to this volume—it is not minor activity, but real money changing hands. Market sentiment is cautious today, with major coins grinding sideways, but funds in the meme sector are clearly looking for an outlet, and $Lobster is the one being selected. From 0.1519 to 0.1957, the i
龙虾+22.88%
GPU-hours might be turning into something you hedge.
The CFTC is already exploring compute derivatives, and Liquid Compute just raised $15M to build a regulated market for GPU futures, options + swaps.
Makes sense if AI compute really grows from ~$360B in 2025 to ~$2.3T by 2030.
The weird part is standardization.
An H100-hour in one region isn’t the same product as a B200-hour somewhere else with different networking, power costs and cluster size.
So before compute gets a real futures market, someone has to invent the benchmark contract everyone agrees to trade around.
Once that exists, labs c
post-image
H100+0.07%
B200-3.49%
[$ETH Signal] Short + order book gap/4H downward pressure
$ETH The 1H candle closed back at 2403, with a gap in bids on the order book.
Depth imbalance: -80.77%, bid/ask 0.11, with extremely thin orders. The 4H MACD green bars are expanding, while the 1H green bars are contracting. Price is holding above the 1H Bollinger lower band at 2388, while the 4H EMA20/50 at 2478/2483 is capping it. Funding rate: -0.0037%, OI stable, positions not withdrawn.
🎯Direction: Short
⚡Entry/orders: 2396.1200 - 2403.3300
🛑Stop-loss: 2473.4860
🚀Target 1: 2298.0959
🚀Target 2: 2245.4789
🛡️Trade management:
-
post-image
ETH-5.85%
I don't dare say anything now, afraid it'll go back down as soon as I do, so I'll just quietly watch.
When I checked the chart after lunch, $HEMI the key level held, funds quietly entered, and buying pressure strengthened, so I suggested going long with a small position. Entry: 0.005583, current price: 0.006361, +274.58%. Feels really good—I can treat myself to a nice meal.
Have a strategy before the market opens, discipline during the session, and reflection afterward.
Take profit on 80% first, and move the protection on the remaining 20% to the entry price. Don't let your profits turn into p
post-image
HEMI+1.03%
ADA-7.36%
DOGE-5.34%
$POWER Signal】Long + support on 1H pullback to the middle band / negative funding rate holding firm
$POWER The negative funding rate of -0.0244% remains in place, while the price holds firmly above the 1H EMA20. The order-book bid-ask ratio is 0.98, fully exposing the intent to support the price with funds.
The 4H MACD histogram remains in bullish territory at 0.0053, with momentum narrowing. The 1H MACD histogram has returned to zero, marking a handover between bulls and bears. The 4H RSI is at a high level of 70.59, while the 1H RSI has cooled to 58.63, with selling pressure quickly absorbe
post-image
POWER+30.43%
Load More

Join 40 M users in our growing community

⚡️ Join 40 M users in the crypto craze discussion

💬 Engage with your favorite top creators

👍 See what interests you

Trending Topics

CLARITYActKeyVoteAhead

147.7k Views6.91k Discussing

The U.S. Senate will hold a key procedural vote on the CLARITY Act on September 15, requiring 60 votes to advance with Republicans holding 53 seats. Kalshi data shows the odds of passage this year have fallen to 25%, with ethics provisions and stablecoin yield still unresolved. What would advancing the bill mean for crypto markets?

GateTopsGlobalGrowth

23.65k Views1.09k Discussing

FedAnnounceRateDecisionSoon

31.63k Views3.57k Discussing

View More