In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between Raydium (RAY) vs Loopring (LRC) has always been a topic that investors can't avoid. The two not only have significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positions in crypto assets.
Raydium (RAY): Since its launch in 2021, it has gained market recognition for its automated market maker (AMM) and liquidity provider built on the Solana blockchain for decentralized exchanges (DEX).
Loopring (LRC): Introduced in 2017, it has been hailed as an open multi-token transaction protocol based on ERC20 and smart contracts, providing a zero-risk token exchange model.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between RAY and LRC, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technical ecosystems, and future predictions, and attempt to answer the question that investors care about most:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
Click to view real-time prices:
Disclaimer: This information is for educational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and unpredictable. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decisions.
RAY:
年份 | 预测最高价 | 预测平均价格 | 预测最低价 | 涨跌幅 |
---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 2.466137 | 1.8001 | 1.638091 | 0 |
2026 | 2.9863659 | 2.1331185 | 1.514514135 | 18 |
2027 | 2.764521576 | 2.5597422 | 1.612637586 | 42 |
2028 | 2.95496639568 | 2.662131888 | 1.7303857272 | 48 |
2029 | 3.0332330731872 | 2.80854914184 | 2.0502408735432 | 56 |
2030 | 3.680322795467136 | 2.9208911075136 | 2.424339619236288 | 62 |
LRC:
年份 | 预测最高价 | 预测平均价格 | 预测最低价 | 涨跌幅 |
---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 0.0956671 | 0.06983 | 0.0537691 | 0 |
2026 | 0.1067456295 | 0.08274855 | 0.0455117025 | 19 |
2027 | 0.1184338621875 | 0.09474708975 | 0.0805350262875 | 36 |
2028 | 0.13643580924 | 0.10659047596875 | 0.067151999860312 | 53 |
2029 | 0.159182216811731 | 0.121513142604375 | 0.1166526169002 | 75 |
2030 | 0.182451983620469 | 0.140347679708053 | 0.075787747042348 | 102 |
⚠️ Risk Warning: Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice. None
Q1: What are the main differences between RAY and LRC? A: RAY is built on the Solana blockchain and focuses on automated market making (AMM) for decentralized exchanges, while LRC is an Ethereum-based protocol specializing in layer-2 scaling solutions and zero-knowledge proofs.
Q2: Which token has shown better price performance historically? A: Both tokens reached their all-time highs in 2021, with RAY peaking at $16.83 and LRC at $3.75. Since then, RAY has fallen to $1.7979, while LRC has dropped to $0.06981 as of October 17, 2025.
Q3: What are the key factors influencing the investment value of RAY and LRC? A: Key factors include supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technical development, ecosystem building, macroeconomic conditions, and market cycles.
Q4: How do the long-term price predictions for RAY and LRC compare? A: By 2030, RAY is predicted to reach $2.42-$3.68 in base and optimistic scenarios, while LRC is expected to reach $0.076-$0.182.
Q5: What are the main risks associated with investing in RAY and LRC? A: Both face market risks, technical risks, and regulatory risks. RAY is heavily dependent on the Solana ecosystem, while LRC is sensitive to Ethereum network upgrades and competition from other layer-2 solutions.
Q6: How should investors approach asset allocation between RAY and LRC? A: Conservative investors might consider allocating 30% to RAY and 70% to LRC, while aggressive investors could opt for 60% RAY and 40% LRC. Individual allocation should be based on personal risk tolerance and market outlook.
Q7: Which token might be more suitable for new investors? A: New investors might consider a balanced approach with a slight preference towards LRC due to its longer market presence. However, it's crucial to conduct thorough research and consider personal risk tolerance before investing in either token.
Share
Content