Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Can we discover Bitcoin's power law origin from the data itself? We tested this by fitting P = A·(t - t₀)^n where all three parameters are optimized simultaneously. The question: does the data prefer Genesis Block (t₀=0) or some other origin?
The R² landscape reveals the answer. When we scan across different values of t₀, the function is remarkably flat around Genesis Block. Plus notice the enormous confidence band.
The unconstrained optimizer finds a mathematical optimum at t₀ = +202 days (July 2009), improving R² from 0.9613 to 0.9628 - a gain of just 0.15% (well within the error bands).
But there is an enormous cost for this insignificant improvement in R^2.
That cost is substantial. At t₀=0, the exponent is n=5.694, within 3.5% of our SSA result (β=5.9). At the unconstrained optimum t₀=+202, the exponent drops to n=5.087, now 13.8% away from SSA. We gain 0.15% in R² but lose agreement with the model-free benchmark.
This is the signature of overfitting: optimizing a narrow metric (R² alone) while degrading broader model quality.
Occam's razor applies with force here. The R² landscape shows that any t₀ within roughly ±200 days of Genesis Block produces nearly identical fits.
With no compelling preference from the data, we choose the simplest model: no offset, no extra parameter. The principle of parsimony favors t₀=0 when adding complexity buys nothing meaningful and damages agreement with independent methods.
When we constrain the optimizer to physically reasonable values (t₀ must precede price data), it converges to t₀ = -0.01 days - essentially Genesis Block itself. The exponent remains at n=5.694, matching SSA within 3.5%. Three independent methods now agree: SSA eigenmode decomposition gives β=5.9, standard power law regression gives β=5.69, and direct nonlinear fitting with optimized origin gives n=5.69 at t₀≈0.
The data offers no meaningful evidence for a shifted time origin. The simplest model consistent with all evidence is the pure power law P ∝ t^5.69 from Genesis Block, January 3, 2009. The network effects started with the network itself.