Governance Structure and Voting Process

The governance process in Saros is driven by token-weighted voting. Each SAROS token represents one vote. Token holders can either vote directly or delegate their voting power to a representative who votes on their behalf. This flexibility allows users to participate based on their level of interest or expertise, while still keeping the process open and inclusive.

To submit a proposal, users typically need to meet a minimum threshold of SAROS tokens. This ensures that only serious and well-considered proposals are brought forward. Once submitted, proposals go through a defined review and discussion period, during which community members can debate the merits or suggest revisions. After this period, the proposal moves to the voting stage.

Voting is conducted entirely on-chain, using smart contracts that record the results transparently. Votes are counted based on the number of tokens assigned to each option. A proposal is accepted if it reaches the required quorum and majority. Some decisions may require a simple majority, while others involving treasury funds or major upgrades may require higher support levels.

Once a proposal is approved, it moves into implementation. Depending on the proposal type, this may involve technical changes by the core contributors, allocation of ecosystem funds, or adjustment of staking parameters. The important aspect is that governance doesn’t just offer an opinion—it actively drives changes across the platform’s operations.

Community Participation and Incentives

Community involvement in governance goes beyond voting. Saros encourages users to engage early by reading, commenting on, and helping shape proposals. This feedback loop creates a more thoughtful decision-making environment where different views can be considered before voting begins. Community channels like Discord and governance forums are often used for these discussions.

To support participation, Saros also links governance rights to staking. Users who stake their SAROS tokens not only earn passive rewards but also strengthen their voting power. This connection reinforces long-term alignment, since staked tokens cannot be easily sold or moved during active governance periods. The more a user contributes to the protocol’s stability, the greater their influence becomes.

Saros also introduced additional engagement layers like the HyperRadiance system. This point-based system tracks user activity and rewards consistent participation. Actions like staking, trading, and voting all contribute to point accumulation. These points may later be converted to token rewards or used to access exclusive features. This adds another level of motivation for users to remain engaged over time.

By combining economic rewards with governance access, Saros creates a model where users are incentivized to care about decisions, not just outcomes. Governance becomes a regular part of platform use—not an occasional extra task.

Impact of Governance on Protocol Development

The governance process in Saros directly affects how the protocol evolves. From adjusting staking emissions to launching new liquidity pools or features in the Super App, every major decision flows through a community review and voting process. This ensures that upgrades align with actual usage needs rather than external market trends or internal team preferences.

For example, if trading volume on Saros DEX grows faster than expected, a community proposal may be created to increase SAROS rewards for liquidity providers. If new projects launch on Solana and users want faster integration, token holders can propose partnerships or ecosystem grants to bring those assets into Saros. Governance creates a mechanism for adapting quickly and efficiently.

Treasury management is another key area governed by token holders. A portion of SAROS tokens is reserved for long-term growth and development. Proposals can be submitted to allocate these funds to research, marketing, community events, or third-party audits. This reduces the need for centralized oversight and gives the community a direct role in resource allocation.

Governance also provides a form of self-regulation. If a feature is underperforming or causing negative effects, users can propose changes or phaseouts. This ability to respond and correct course helps Saros maintain long-term stability without depending on fixed roadmaps or centralized leadership.

Highlights

• SAROS holders can propose and vote on decisions that affect the platform, including upgrades, reward changes, and treasury spending.
• Proposals follow a process that includes review, open discussion, on-chain voting, and implementation if approved.
• Staked SAROS tokens increase voting power, which creates a connection between protocol commitment and decision-making influence.
• Participation is further supported by systems like HyperRadiance, which track and reward consistent engagement with points.
• Governance decisions impact key areas like liquidity incentives, feature development, and how treasury funds are used.