Global Data Falsification: How to Find the Truth?

Global industry associations or industry leaders generally sponsor scientific research.

When sugar becomes hard to sell, let research institutions do studies on it. Research showing that eating more sugar is beneficial to health.

When instant noodles become hard to sell, let research institutions do studies on their health and nutrition.

If you don’t want people to have children, let research institutions do studies on the benefits of late marriage and late childbirth for health.

If you want more people to have children, let institutions do studies on how having more children benefits physical health.

For example:

Coca-Cola has provided nearly $4 million to research institutions and non-profit organizations. These funded organizations almost unanimously conclude that obesity is unrelated to high-calorie drinks, and that preventing obesity should focus more on increasing exercise.

The American Sugar Industry Association has been fighting authoritative research on the health risks of sugar, while funding studies that tend to conclude that “sugar is harmless” or “artificial sweeteners are harmful.”

“Sticking to late marriage and late childbirth benefits both the country and individuals,” was a test question back in the day, encouraging late marriage and fewer children.

#研究称生两个孩子最有利于长寿##女性生育3到4个子女死亡风险最低#, in recent years, the birth rate has collapsed. This is trending on social media recently, encouraging early marriage and more children.

What is the truth?

Always think from the perspective of those in power!

For example, when a natural disaster occurs, officials say that the supply of vegetables and medicine is very sufficient, and advise not to stockpile food or medicine. This is to maintain stability. From a big-picture perspective, there’s nothing wrong with this starting point.

If you believe it, you might go hungry.

For example, the B-circle always profits big, every trade makes money, claiming an eternal bull market and wealth myth. They do this to earn advertising fees and commission from trading signals, which is perfectly fine.

If you believe it, you might go bankrupt.

Instant noodles and sugar are beneficial to people, but they also have drawbacks. No one can control all sources of information single-handedly. As long as you think a little, consider the opposite, search in reverse, and view objectively, it’s easy to reach the correct conclusion.

The conclusion is that sugar has many benefits. Under certain conditions, this conclusion is definitely correct.

Just search backwards for “the harms of sugar,” cross-verify, and the answer will come out.

Of course, some people in the B-circle get rich quickly, but the probability is extremely low. Why do some people get rich while others go bankrupt? Cross-verify and understand the underlying logic. The truth is within.

And so on. **$ZETA **$ZBCN $ZEREBRO