Watching foreigners' Open Source Monad's fully automatic script is like a Story, winding up TX destined to have nothing. Instead of doing Monad, it's better to first organize the numbers in your hand, with priority given to the official numbers that actively send you test coins, followed by the official Faucet numbers where you can receive 2 coins, and then the numbers where you can receive 0.05 coin. At that time, the leading role in L2, Zks, is a project with 100 numbers in hand, not all of them are anti-hair, but those who brush TX volumes monthly also gain nothing. The rule changes of an Airdrop inevitably eliminate the majority. Because even the largest projects cannot withstand the full anti-hair people shearing.

With the current upgrade of scripts, scientists are able to create a large number of accounts that may appear more human-like than those created manually. How can the project party distinguish between them? The key to distinguishing between you and scientists lies not in the method, but in multi-chain data, just like Pengu sending old OG on the ETH and SOL chains. Are you sure you won't have a few interactions on the mainnet with a gas of 0.8? NFT+DEFI+ENS domains, as long as Ethereum exists, ENS will always be a participation threshold and Airdrop benefit for some projects.