Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
The biggest contributor to resisting the pressure of inscriptions?On the improvement of zkSync by the Boojum upgrade
Written by: Haotian
Recently, @zksync completed the Boojum upgrade, and it was on this premise that zkSync withstood the stress test of Operation SYNC Inscription. However, Boojum is undervalued by the market.
What performance improvements does Boojum bring? Can the criticized Decentralized Finance stability problem be solved? Next, let’s talk about my understanding:
When a batch is encapsulated, these transactions are broken down into multiple specific circuits, which are then processed in parallel and high-speed to generate a large number of STARKs, which are finally aggregated into a STARK proof. Finally, the STARK proof is encapsulated into an SNARK proof and submitted to the Mainnet for verification.
This mix of STARKs and SNARKs ensures efficient processing of large volumes of transactions, while dropping the size of the data submitted to the Mainnet (SNARKs are simpler) and more compatible with the Mainnet.
The use of two proofs at the same time means that the advanced compression technology, hardware acceleration technology, Algorithm optimization, batch processing aggregation efficiency, memory and storage optimization of the Prover system will have significant performance improvements.
The principle is not difficult to understand, layer 2 submits proof of status data to the Mainnet calldata, due to the limited storage data on the Mainnet, layer 2’s STARK parallel processing capabilities and SNARK proof compression processing technology determine the transaction volume and gas level that can be processed by a single batch;
Now the transaction volume of a single batch in layer2 has increased significantly, and more Oracle data status updates can be accommodated within the block. Decentralized Finance stability issues will also be effectively solved.
As the zkSync official @anthonykrose stated, no matter how many Oracle Machine updates are contained in a Block, the entire Block state can be processed and recorded as a whole, and only need to pay the cost of one state write. This is beneficial for the low fees, high efficiency, and stability of Decentralized Finance applications on the ZK-Rollup chain.
It stands to reason that Boojum’s upgrade should be regarded as a milestone for zkSync.
On the one hand, it verifies the inference that the larger the transaction volume of the ZK system, the lower the gas fee, the better the experience, and on the other hand, it also proves that the efficient application and performance improvement of computing resources such as compression technology and hardware acceleration of the off-chain Prover system will bring infinite imagination to the ZK system.
After the Cancun upgrade EthereumMainnet blob Block Size was expected to drop the cost of layer2 batch transactions, and now the technical optimization of the ZK system itself has brought the ZK series rollup and the OP series rollup to the same level.
The point is, ZK-Rollup is much more “active” than OP-Rollup. The advantages of ZK-Rollup technology, which have always been told, have been fully proven after the Boojum upgrade.
Reference: For ZK hardware acceleration, Computing Power optimization, etc., please refer to the following research reports: