Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Today I thought about the IBC/message passing system. To put it simply, each cross-chain transfer actually involves trusting a set of things: the source chain won't rollback, the light client/proof verification won't fail, the relay/relayer won't go offline (although theoretically anyone can run one, in reality there are always "main players"), and the target chain's processing logic won't be broken; if there's also a bridge contract/multisig/oracle involved, then the trust layer is further amplified. Recently, people have been comparing RWA and even U.S. Treasury yields to on-chain yield products. I also ask first: are these yields based on real cash flow, or just sustained by "the bridge not failing"... Anyway, before cross-chain transfers, I always check how many components are involved. I'd rather be slow than create opportunities for setbacks.