Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Just came across Robert Kiyosaki's take on something most people get wrong about retirement planning. He's been pretty vocal about this: is a house an asset? His answer might surprise you, and honestly, it challenges everything we've been taught about homeownership.
Here's the thing - Kiyosaki defines an asset pretty simply. It puts money in your pocket. A liability? It takes money out. By that logic, your primary residence is a liability because it's constantly draining cash. Mortgage payments, property taxes, maintenance, utilities - it's relentless. Your home isn't generating income unless you're renting it out. It's just consuming your monthly cash flow.
I think what makes his argument compelling is how he breaks down the math. Until you're actually earning from your property - through rental income or some other cash flow - is a house an asset in the traditional sense? Not really. It's sitting there costing you money every single month. The roof leaks, the furnace breaks, property taxes go up. These aren't optional expenses.
Now, the real question becomes: can your home ever be your retirement ticket? Kiyosaki says it depends. If you're banking on appreciation alone, you're gambling. Markets shift. Recessions happen. He's seen it before - the 2008 crash wiped out a lot of people's supposed retirement plans. Waiting for your house to triple in value while you're paying thousands annually in expenses? That's not a strategy, that's hope.
What actually works, according to him, is treating real estate differently. Investment properties that generate rent? Those are assets. Short-term rentals? Assets. Your primary residence? That's your home first, and a potential investment second - but only if you're earning from it.
The asset classes worth considering are different anyway. Business, stocks and bonds, commodities like gold, cryptocurrency (Bitcoin and Ethereum are good examples here), and real estate that actually produces income. These are what actually build wealth.
So here's the takeaway: stop treating your primary residence as your retirement plan. It's costing you money, not making it. If you want real assets for retirement, you need things that put cash in your pocket, not drain it. Your home should be enjoyed as a home - that's its purpose. Everything else is just noise.