Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
After I muted the group, I feel much more at peace, less of that impulse to glance over whenever someone calls out "attack" on me; as a result, I’m more willing to go through project details myself... Honestly, it’s to avoid being driven by emotions.
For a newbie assessing credibility, I currently focus on three things: Don’t just look at stars on GitHub, first check if there have been recent continuous commits, or if it’s just a bunch of "temporary fixes"; don’t be fooled by the logo in the audit report, directly search for "high-risk/critical issues" and see if there are clear fix explanations; when upgrading multi-signature, look at who the signers are, how many people can make decisions, and if there’s a time lock—otherwise, a simple "upgradable" means "can be changed at any time." Recently, people keep explaining crypto market rises and falls with ETF fund flows and US stock risk appetite, I also look at that, but the more I see, the more I think: macro is macro, contracts are contracts, and if the contract is poorly written, even a good macro can’t save it... Anyway, I now pause for two seconds before confirming.