Actually, everyone understands that governance voting often ends up being "whoever has the most votes makes the decision," but every time I open the delegation page, I still feel anxious: delegating votes to major nodes with one click is convenient, but the more convenient it is, the more it seems like I'm giving oligarchs a lifeline... Right now, I prefer to go slower, first checking if the proposals include real impacts like changing risk parameters or confirmation thresholds for bridges, then decide who to delegate to; when I see those beautifully worded proposals with empty details, I just ignore them. Recently, the funding rates are extreme again, and in the group, people are arguing whether to reverse or continue squeezing the bubble. I'm actually more concerned about: at such times, who is voting, who can veto with a single vote, is governance really about "governance," or just stamping approval for big players. Anyway, I prefer to be conservative and not casually hand over my votes.