Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I just learned that the meeting at the White House between the crypto industry and banks regarding stablecoin yields didn't really make much progress. That's actually interesting because it shows how far apart their positions still are.
The thing is: Stablecoins are fundamentally a blockchain concept that both banks and the crypto industry want, but for very different reasons. To simplify the blockchain explanation — it’s about who has control and how profits are distributed. Traditional financial institutions naturally want to preserve their usual business models, while the crypto side demands more decentralization and transparency.
What’s interesting is that these disagreements can’t just be brushed aside. They stem from fundamental differences in philosophy. Banks think in terms of traditional return models, while the blockchain community thinks differently. This makes a quick agreement unrealistic.
For the market, this could mean we’ll stay in this gray area for a while. No clear rules, but also no strict bans. Some see this as an opportunity, others as a risk. Personally, I think it’s important to follow these discussions — they influence how the entire industry develops.
Anyone interested in such regulatory developments should keep an eye on Gate to see how stablecoin markets evolve.