Congressional Research Service Just Put XRP in the Same Sentence As Bitcoin and Ethereum

@media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=“wrapper-sevio-6a57f7be-8f6e-4deb-ae2c-5477f86653a5”]{width:320px;height:100px;} } @media only screen and (min-width: 728px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=“wrapper-sevio-6a57f7be-8f6e-4deb-ae2c-5477f86653a5”]{width:728px;height:90px;} }

Crypto analyst Xaif Crypto has highlighted a newly published legal document from the Congressional Research Service, describing it as a significant moment for XRP’s regulatory positioning in the United States.

In an X post, the analyst emphasized that XRP was explicitly mentioned alongside Bitcoin and Ethereum within official guidance tied to federal oversight of crypto markets.

The document, dated April 3, 2026, outlines guidance issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, with alignment from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Xaif Crypto underscored that the reference to XRP appears in writing within a formal legal sidebar produced by Congress’s research arm and frames the development as a formal acknowledgment rather than a speculative interpretation.

Details from the Congressional Research Service Document

The attached document shows that the Congressional Research Service discussed the concept of “digital commodities” in relation to crypto-assets. Within that explanation, it identified several assets that fall into this category, explicitly naming Bitcoin, Ether, XRP, and Solana.

The classification describes digital commodities as assets whose value is linked to the functional operation of a crypto system and broader market dynamics, rather than reliance on managerial efforts.

The text further explains that such assets do not inherently grant rights to profits, passive income, or ownership in a business entity. As a result, they are not considered investment contracts under this interpretation.

Xaif Crypto noted this classification as particularly important, given ongoing regulatory debates in the United States regarding how different digital assets should be categorized.

By highlighting XRP within this context, the analyst suggests that the document contributes to its positioning within the regulatory landscape, especially as lawmakers consider legislation to define jurisdiction between agencies like the SEC and CFTC.

Community Reactions Reflect Broader Sentiment

Xaif Crypto’s post focuses primarily on the document’s formal nature and its implications. By stressing that the reference comes directly from a Congressional Research Service publication, the analyst positions the development as part of an official record tied to U.S. legislative processes. The emphasis remains on the fact that the mention is documented, dated, and connected to coordinated guidance involving both the SEC and CFTC.

Disclaimer*: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.*