Regarding the issue of frequent stop-losses, I've come across many explanations. Some attribute it to emotional trading, some say it's due to an ineffective system, and others believe it's purely a matter of probability. All of these are valid, but after reviewing my own trades, I realize there's a more fundamental reason — too many signals.

First, exclude cases of pure gambling or emotional outbursts. If you're trading according to rules but still frequently hitting stop-losses, the problem is likely not the market but yourself.
The biggest issue for many is: wanting to catch everything.
They want to trade breakouts, but also don't want to miss pullbacks. Theoretically, participating in both seems to offer more opportunities, but in practice, it exposes you to two sets of risks simultaneously.
Breakouts can easily be false signals, and pullbacks might turn into trend reversals. Doing both is like stepping into every trap.
Next, there's the problem of indicators.
MACD, moving averages, Bollinger Bands... The more you learn, the more signals you get, making it seem more "comprehensive." But in reality, it becomes more chaotic.
Each indicator is based on a set of logic, but when you combine these logics in your trading, you're essentially increasing your trading frequency rather than improving your win rate.