Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Just read about this wild legal battle between Archer and Joby - two of the biggest names racing to launch electric air taxi services. Apparently Archer just filed a countersuit claiming Joby has been hiding deep ties to Chinese suppliers and even received tech grants directly from the Chinese government. The accusation is pretty crazy too - Archer says Joby shipped aircraft parts from China into the US by literally labeling them as socks, napkins, and hair clips to dodge tariffs. Wild stuff.
Joby's attorney basically said the claims are nonsense and called it invented, but here's where it gets interesting. This legal move came the same day the FAA announced both companies got approved for new eVTOL pilot programs. So you've got this massive market opportunity on the horizon - we're talking potentially a trillion dollar industry by 2040 - and they're fighting it out in court over China ties and whether one company actually stole trade secrets from the other.
The stock reaction was pretty telling though. Archer popped over 4% and Joby climbed more than 5% on Monday. Both companies have serious backing - Archer's positioned as the official taxi provider for the 2028 LA Olympics and Joby's got Air Force contracts plus plans to launch commercial flights in Dubai soon. But if these allegations stick, especially the China angle, it could completely shift how regulators view both of them. Curious to see how this plays out.