Why does gold, when it should be the safest, often end up causing people to lose money? 【Peifengke Master Class 2.4】

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Preview of great content

Many people have had similar feelings lately: geopolitical conflicts escalating, risk rising, and by intuition, gold should be the most direct beneficiary. But reality is not always like that.

In the recent round of volatility caused by the U.S.-Iran conflict, you’ll notice an uncomfortable phenomenon—when liquidity begins to tighten, gold is sold as well.

This actually happened in history long ago. In March 2020, when the market entered a liquidity squeeze phase, gold, in an environment where it was supposed to rise the most, instead plunged by 15% quickly.

Why, when risk-off sentiment is at its strongest, doesn’t gold “serve as a safe haven” anymore?

When the market starts deleveraging and replenishing liquidity, what exactly is money selling?

Why is it that many people precisely at this moment experience the biggest drawdown?

In the face of liquidity risk, there is no truly “safe asset.”

In this section, Peifengke Chen Dapeng will combine his own trading post-mortems to explain clearly how to seize the timing and set aside room in advance for “liquidity risk.”

Click here or the course schedule below to unlock the full course, and see whether, when the next similar volatility appears, you’ll still be positioned where you “should be avoiding risk,” but absorbing the largest losses.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin