Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Sergey Ivancheglo, the co-founder of IOTA also known by the alias CFB, has become the central figure in an emerging network security controversy. Through his blockchain initiative Qubic, which employs a novel incentive structure called "useful proof of work" (uPoW), Ivancheglo has orchestrated a significant shift in the computational landscape of the Monero network. Beginning in May, the hash rate contribution from Qubic has experienced dramatic growth, escalating from under 2% to approximately 27% by early August—a period of just a few months that has triggered substantial backlash within the cryptocurrency community. This concentration of mining power has ignited serious discussions about the long-term sustainability of Monero's decentralized architecture and the potential vulnerabilities it could create.
When confronted with concerns about his actions, Ivancheglo characterized the initiative as an "economic demonstration" meant to showcase Qubic's technological capabilities rather than any deliberate effort to compromise the network. However, he notably acknowledged that the mining campaign could substantially affect how the Monero blockchain operates under normal conditions. Beyond these statements, Ivancheglo announced that starting in August, Qubic would cease publishing detailed information about its hash rate contributions to the network. According to Ivancheglo, this decision stems from his intent to "raise awareness of the risks associated with centralized control"—specifically the threat of 51% network dominance—underscoring the delicate balance required to maintain true decentralization in blockchain systems.