Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Billy Markus Defends Elon Musk Against Biased Press Narrative
Billy Markus, co-founder of Dogecoin, known on social media as Shibetoshi Nakamoto, publicly defended Elon Musk, arguing that media coverage distorts the public perception of Tesla’s CEO. Through a series of posts on X, Billy Markus criticized what he considers an orchestrated media campaign to discredit the entrepreneur.
Transparency as a Double-Edged Sword in Media Coverage
Billy Markus pointed out that Elon Musk is often misunderstood due to his open and straightforward communication style. According to the Dogecoin co-founder, Musk’s transparency—which should be valued—makes him vulnerable to attacks from narrative machines driven by hidden agendas. Markus emphasized that “Musk’s literalness provides ample ammunition for critics, but there seems to be laziness and mediocrity in how these criticisms are constructed.”
Elon Musk’s own response was brief: “Yes, I try to be literal.” However, Billy Markus deepened his critique, suggesting that the press not only manipulates narratives but also conveniently chooses the worst interpretations of Musk’s statements. This biased coverage pattern, according to the Dogecoin creator, has significantly shaped billions of people’s perceptions of the businessman.
Billy Markus and the Dogecoin Community Engaged in Political Activism
As Elon Musk deepens his involvement in Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, the Dogecoin community also ramps up its political participation. Billy Markus and other supporters used their platforms to mobilize voters and promote the Republican candidacy during the 2024 US presidential election.
During this campaign, Musk led strategic meetings funded by his PAC, where he frequently discussed the transformative role of cryptocurrencies, particularly Dogecoin and XRP, in promoting individual freedom. Billy Markus endorsed these positions, reinforcing that digital currencies represent more than financial speculation—they embody a philosophy of economic autonomy.
Tesla Maintains a Robust Bitcoin Portfolio Amid Intensifying Debate
Beyond political involvement, Elon Musk’s Tesla officially confirmed it holds 11,509 bitcoins in reserves. Valued at the current price of approximately $72,900 per bitcoin, these holdings total around $839 million—a significant digital asset that remains intact on the company’s balance sheet.
The media speculated about possible sales based on wallet movements, but Tesla clarified that these transfers are merely part of wallet rotation for operational security reasons. The financial report for Q3 2024 confirmed that there was no disposal of Bitcoin reserves, reaffirming the company’s commitment to this asset.
Regulatory Pressure Mounts as Controversies Surround Musk’s Initiatives
The landscape for Elon Musk became more complex when the U.S. Department of Justice warned Musk’s PAC about his controversial giveaway initiative, which offered $1 million daily to encourage voter registration. Critics questioned the legality of this strategy, while figures like investor Mark Cuban suggested Musk had exceeded traditional support, effectively taking on coordination of Trump’s campaign.
Regulatory concerns intensified when Cuban explicitly questioned whether Musk’s payments constituted illegal contributions to the presidential campaign. Despite these pressures, Billy Markus continued to support Elon Musk’s actions, arguing that such persecution reflects exactly the pattern of opposition he had previously denounced. According to Billy Markus, the conflict between media narrative and reality remains the core backdrop of this controversy.