09:10 Observing TRUMPUSDT: Current price 3.605, 24h -2.80%. Sentiment is cold (Fear&Greed 26). In this environment, "rebounds that don't extend/breaks that pull back up" oscillations are more likely, so I prefer to clarify the framework first, react according to price levels, rather than guess direction based on emotion.

I'm only watching two key levels: A Confirmation level 3.76900000, B Breakdown level 3.59200000. When price is below A, I treat it as a retracement rally—prioritizing volume observation and pullback speed. Only if it breaks through A effectively and holds above it does it qualify to upgrade from "watching" to "considering participation." Conversely, if it breaks below B again and stays there, short-term weakness must be acknowledged; better to do less than to stubbornly hold on.

By the way, there's been a lot of news recently regarding geopolitical conflicts and regulatory stance, but I only treat it as background noise, not verified fact, and certainly not as a trading signal. This type of narrative token is easily driven by news cycles—the more noise, the more discipline is needed on position size and frequency. This isn't a confirmation signal, just an observation framework.

For reference only, not investment advice.

Would you rather see it stabilize above B first before discussing a rebound, or break out decisively above A on volume before considering participation?