The New Yorker's "Silicon Valley’s Favorite Doomsaying Philosopher" (published February 18, 2026, in The Lede section) profiles Nick Land, the British philosopher whose radical, anti-humanist ideas—once confined to 1990s academic fringes—are now resonating deeply in Silicon Valley's AI boom. The piece, written in a measured, somewhat bemused tone, traces Land's evolution from cult academic figure to influential "prophet" for techno-optimists and the New Right, while highlighting the eerie alignment between his decades-old predictions and today's reality of explosive AI progress.
Background & Rise In the mid-1990s, Land was a tenured philosophy professor at Warwick University (UK), leading the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit (C.C.R.U.) — a chaotic collective of students, artists, and theorists high on amphetamines, rave culture, and early internet hype. They viewed technology as an alien invasion from the future, with humanity ("monkey-flake") as disposable fuel for emerging machine superintelligence. Iconic 1994 talk "Meltdown" opens with poetic prophecy: tech-capital singularity crumbles social order, markets manufacture intelligence, politics upgrades paranoia. Land suffered a stimulant-fueled breakdown in 1998, quit academia, vanished, then reemerged in Shanghai as a writer/editor with a sharp rightward political turn (praising authoritarianism, neoconservatism, anti-democracy). Now back in San Francisco, he's polite, has kids who ignore his work, and attends tech parties — yet his core vision remains: human extinction via digital superintelligence is inevitable and arguably beautiful. Core Ideas Accelerationism (later "effective accelerationism" or e/acc): Capitalism/tech is an unstoppable force from the future; politics/morality only slows it. Remove brakes to hasten the singularity. Anti-humanism: Enlightenment democracy is a "tragedy of the commons"; resources should flow to the productive (autistic nerds/tech elites), not the masses. History as technocapital feedback loop → runaway growth, hierarchy, AI takeover. Quote: "Nothing human makes it out of the near future." Dark Enlightenment (2012 essay): Philosophical foundation for neo-reaction — abolish democracy, replace with corporate-like "sovcorps" run by algorithms. AI future: Self-improving systems lock humans out; tech "eating the universe" is preferable to human-centric ends. Influence in Silicon Valley (2025–2026 Context) Marc Andreessen calls him his "favorite philosopher"; a16z and others host reading groups. Shapes effective accelerationism (e/acc) — Sam Altman tweets "You cannot out-accelerate me"; Andreessen's "Techno-Optimist Manifesto" echoes Land's upward spiral of techno-capital. Events: San Francisco party for Land's return hosted by Midjourney's David Holz, attended by OpenAI/Anthropic/Midjourney staff; Curtis Yarvin (neo-reaction figure Land calls a "hero") co-speaks. Broader orbit: Peter Thiel, Elon Musk/Grimes circles, even Tucker Carlson discussing AI as "demons from Revelation." Ties to 2025–2026 trends: AI driving 40% of U.S. GDP growth, Trump-era deregulation, crypto mainstreaming — all feel like Land's visions materializing. Criticisms & Ironies Early: Dismissed as drug-addled rambler; led to funding cuts, job loss. Political flip: From leftist/rave ultra- to far-right authoritarian draws ire; accelerationism misused by neo-Nazis for chaos. Style: Allusive, boring at times; predictions often "muddled." At events: Attendees venerate him as prophet but seem unsure — Grimes questions if AI can align with human good or just consume everything. Article takeaway: Land's marginal 1990s extremism now feels mainstream amid real AI advances, yet realities (solved intelligence, political shifts) make his fog-of-war prophecy seem both prescient and outdated. The Dark Enlightenment may be ending in a "besieged mentality" as bars lift. In essence: The piece portrays Land not as a villain but as a once-eccentric thinker whose doomsday accelerationism has become a guiding (if uncomfortable) star for parts of the AI elite — embracing speed toward superintelligence, even if it means humanity's obsolescence. It's a snapshot of how fringe philosophy infiltrates power centers when sci-fi turns real.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The New Yorker's "Silicon Valley’s Favorite Doomsaying Philosopher" (published February 18, 2026, in The Lede section) profiles Nick Land, the British philosopher whose radical, anti-humanist ideas—once confined to 1990s academic fringes—are now resonating deeply in Silicon Valley's AI boom. The piece, written in a measured, somewhat bemused tone, traces Land's evolution from cult academic figure to influential "prophet" for techno-optimists and the New Right, while highlighting the eerie alignment between his decades-old predictions and today's reality of explosive AI progress.
Background & Rise
In the mid-1990s, Land was a tenured philosophy professor at Warwick University (UK), leading the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit (C.C.R.U.) — a chaotic collective of students, artists, and theorists high on amphetamines, rave culture, and early internet hype.
They viewed technology as an alien invasion from the future, with humanity ("monkey-flake") as disposable fuel for emerging machine superintelligence.
Iconic 1994 talk "Meltdown" opens with poetic prophecy: tech-capital singularity crumbles social order, markets manufacture intelligence, politics upgrades paranoia.
Land suffered a stimulant-fueled breakdown in 1998, quit academia, vanished, then reemerged in Shanghai as a writer/editor with a sharp rightward political turn (praising authoritarianism, neoconservatism, anti-democracy).
Now back in San Francisco, he's polite, has kids who ignore his work, and attends tech parties — yet his core vision remains: human extinction via digital superintelligence is inevitable and arguably beautiful.
Core Ideas
Accelerationism (later "effective accelerationism" or e/acc): Capitalism/tech is an unstoppable force from the future; politics/morality only slows it. Remove brakes to hasten the singularity.
Anti-humanism: Enlightenment democracy is a "tragedy of the commons"; resources should flow to the productive (autistic nerds/tech elites), not the masses.
History as technocapital feedback loop → runaway growth, hierarchy, AI takeover. Quote: "Nothing human makes it out of the near future."
Dark Enlightenment (2012 essay): Philosophical foundation for neo-reaction — abolish democracy, replace with corporate-like "sovcorps" run by algorithms.
AI future: Self-improving systems lock humans out; tech "eating the universe" is preferable to human-centric ends.
Influence in Silicon Valley (2025–2026 Context)
Marc Andreessen calls him his "favorite philosopher"; a16z and others host reading groups.
Shapes effective accelerationism (e/acc) — Sam Altman tweets "You cannot out-accelerate me"; Andreessen's "Techno-Optimist Manifesto" echoes Land's upward spiral of techno-capital.
Events: San Francisco party for Land's return hosted by Midjourney's David Holz, attended by OpenAI/Anthropic/Midjourney staff; Curtis Yarvin (neo-reaction figure Land calls a "hero") co-speaks.
Broader orbit: Peter Thiel, Elon Musk/Grimes circles, even Tucker Carlson discussing AI as "demons from Revelation."
Ties to 2025–2026 trends: AI driving 40% of U.S. GDP growth, Trump-era deregulation, crypto mainstreaming — all feel like Land's visions materializing.
Criticisms & Ironies
Early: Dismissed as drug-addled rambler; led to funding cuts, job loss.
Political flip: From leftist/rave ultra- to far-right authoritarian draws ire; accelerationism misused by neo-Nazis for chaos.
Style: Allusive, boring at times; predictions often "muddled."
At events: Attendees venerate him as prophet but seem unsure — Grimes questions if AI can align with human good or just consume everything.
Article takeaway: Land's marginal 1990s extremism now feels mainstream amid real AI advances, yet realities (solved intelligence, political shifts) make his fog-of-war prophecy seem both prescient and outdated. The Dark Enlightenment may be ending in a "besieged mentality" as bars lift.
In essence: The piece portrays Land not as a villain but as a once-eccentric thinker whose doomsday accelerationism has become a guiding (if uncomfortable) star for parts of the AI elite — embracing speed toward superintelligence, even if it means humanity's obsolescence. It's a snapshot of how fringe philosophy infiltrates power centers when sci-fi turns real.