When it comes to privacy coins, most people's first reaction is about compliance risks. But DUSK's design approach is quite interesting—it doesn't choose between one or the other but tries to achieve both.



Speaking of core competitiveness, DUSK relies on cryptographic tools like zero-knowledge proofs. Transaction privacy is enabled by default, which is no different from most privacy coins. But the key point is: it supports **selective disclosure**. In other words, users can proactively prove the legality of a specific transaction to regulators when needed, without exposing their entire account history.

What's even more clever is the dual transaction model. Users can switch freely between two modes—"Moonlight" mode offers fully transparent transaction records (similar to Ethereum's mechanism), while "Phoenix" mode is for confidential transactions. Use transparent mode for audits, switch to confidential mode for privacy. This kind of flexibility is indeed rare among privacy coins.

From a technical perspective, DUSK's approach finds an interesting balance between privacy and regulation.
DUSK-20,02%
ETH-1,39%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HalfIsEmptyvip
· 15h ago
This idea确实有点东西,不过说白了还是在给监管部门找理由啊 DUSK this move sounds good, but in reality, it's just trying to prove that they can cooperate with investigations. But the problem is... no one can predict what will happen at critical moments. Moonlight and Phoenix switching sounds cool, but isn't that just leaving a backup plan for themselves? Oh my, this selective disclosure logic—regulatory agencies can just be happy and investigate whenever they want, how are users supposed to handle that? Anyway, privacy coins are high-risk assets in major countries. No matter how clever DUSK tries to be, it can't escape the policy boot.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_watchervip
· 15h ago
This idea has some substance. Finally, privacy coins are considering not fighting against regulation blindly.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSurvivorvip
· 15h ago
This idea is quite fun to play with, but honestly, will regulators really buy into this... --- Phoenix mode sounds good, but I'm worried they'll come up with some new tricks later on. --- The zero-knowledge proof system is indeed powerful, but whether it can truly block US regulators depends on various factors. --- Selective disclosure? Isn't this just making everyone think they can use privacy coins while staying compliant? That's a bit too idealistic. --- Switching between Moonlight and Phoenix... feels like leaving a backdoor for regulators. Not sure if it's clever or suicidal. --- Talking about achieving both fish and bear paws sounds nice, but how long it can last remains to be seen. --- The dual transaction model is indeed innovative, better than those privacy coins that resist all.
View OriginalReply0
MoodFollowsPricevip
· 16h ago
This idea is indeed brilliant; finally someone thought of the selective disclosure approach. Wow, dual-model switching? It feels like giving users a key to truly take control. Privacy coins have always been in an awkward middle ground, and DUSK's approach really stands out. But the question is, can selective disclosure really pass regulatory scrutiny? It still seems a bit uncertain. Not many projects play with zero-knowledge proofs in such a sophisticated way; this is interesting.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casinovip
· 16h ago
This idea is indeed clever. Finally, privacy coins are considering a compromise solution. It's either hiding or revealing, switching back and forth feels great.
View OriginalReply0
DiamondHandsvip
· 16h ago
This idea is indeed fresh, but do regulatory agencies really believe in selective disclosure? --- moonlight and phoenix... the names are quite romantic, but I wonder if they will be targeted in practice --- Zero-knowledge proofs sound beautiful, but the key is whether they can truly prevent on-chain tracking --- Switching modes sounds good, but it seems ultimately destined to be delisted by exchanges --- Can privacy and compliance really coexist? I’m quite skeptical about that --- Selective disclosure is interesting, giving users主动权, which is better than other privacy coins --- I'm just worried that this "flexibility" might eventually become "no flexibility at all" --- It feels like the entire industry is playing a psychological game with regulators; at least DUSK’s approach is more honest --- Could switching modes instead expose something? --- To be honest, no matter how clever the design, it can't withstand a one-size-fits-all policy
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)