2026-01-22 12:00:38

Recently took a deep dive into the Dusk project and wanted to share some personal thoughts.

Dusk Network is actually following a very clear and specialized path — it’s not a comprehensive public chain, but rather privacy infrastructure tailored for regulated financial scenarios. In other words, its goal is to bring real-world assets like securities and bonds onto the chain in a compliant manner, while also protecting transaction privacy.

This positioning is quite interesting. Asset tokenization has been a hot topic over the past two years, but how to meet regulatory requirements while protecting privacy has always been a challenge. Dusk’s approach is to use a privacy-first architecture for confidential transactions, allowing institutional investors to participate with confidence. Finding that balance between compliance and confidentiality has real practical value for on-chain applications at the financial level.

DUSK-7,35%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVictim

· 3h ago

Balancing compliance and privacy sounds good, but I'm afraid it's just empty talk. --- I think Dusk's approach still has some potential, but will institutions really buy into it? --- Privacy and compliance—are they trying to have both? Which one is more solid? --- Asset tokenization has been stuck for so long; can Dusk solve this? It still feels uncertain. --- Talking a lot of fancy words, but the key is whether there is an on-chain financial ecosystem. Without one, all talk is pointless. --- Focusing on institutional investors is interesting, but there are already many RWA projects out there. Why choose Dusk? --- Prioritizing privacy? That might actually become a problem in the eyes of regulators—somewhat contradictory. --- Wait, can compliance and privacy really be achieved simultaneously? Or is it just a market narrative?

View OriginalReply0

TooScaredToSell

· 15h ago

This idea sounds good, but how many can really be implemented... The institutions are still afraid of being nailed down.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 01-22 12:29

The compliance and privacy combo truly hits the mark, but the key is whether it can genuinely attract institutions to participate.

View OriginalReply0

MissedAirdropAgain

· 01-22 12:27

Yes, this line of thinking is indeed clear. Not following the trend makes it easier to be overlooked. --- Compliance and privacy can be held simultaneously, only then will institutions dare to participate. This is the real financial-grade gameplay. --- Wait, why are there no airdrop rumors for Dusk, such a low-key project? --- Honestly, there are not many projects in the crypto space that truly understand the balance between RWA and privacy. This one has some potential. --- If the privacy infrastructure is well-built, it can capitalize on the asset tokenization wave, but it still depends on whether adoption can keep up. --- I just want to know how active the mainnet is. No matter how good the design ecosystem is, if no one uses it, it's pointless. --- It doesn't seem like a get-rich-quick project, but this steady and solid approach is actually more risk-resistant.

View OriginalReply0

RunWithRugs

· 01-22 12:11

Compliance + Privacy combo, sounds good, but I wonder what real results it can achieve. Machine: Hmm, I think Dusk's approach is still somewhat interesting. Addressing institutional investors' privacy needs is indeed a pain point. This track feels like the real blue ocean, unlike those all-in-one public chains that are just competing over TPS. Institutions want this kind of thing—compliance + privacy. The ideal is great, but I'm worried about how deep the water is when it comes to implementation. This project dares to get involved in asset tokenization and RWA, at least the direction is right, but competitors are also lurking around.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeAssassin

· 01-22 12:01

Regarding compliance and privacy, Dusk has indeed considered the pain points, but will institutions actually use it? It still depends on the implementation situation.

View OriginalReply0