Are stablecoins a necessity for large-scale AI trading? What do industry giants think?

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【Blockchain Rhythm】On January 22nd, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Jeremy Allaire, the leader of Circle, put forward an interesting viewpoint: when billions of AI agents in the future need to conduct large-scale transactions, stablecoins will become the only system capable of supporting this scale.

This judgment is worth pondering. From the current market perspective, AI applications are indeed in an explosive growth phase, and in processes involving asset circulation and payment settlement, the efficiency and flexibility of traditional financial systems have inherent limitations. In contrast, stablecoins, based on blockchain technology—operating 24/7, seamless cross-border transactions, fast transaction confirmation—do possess unique advantages when handling massive concurrent transactions.

Allaire’s statement also, to some extent, reflects the development direction of the stablecoin track. The current stablecoin market size is already quite substantial. As the infrastructure of the Web3 ecosystem, its applications in DeFi, payments, cross-chain settlement, and other scenarios are continuously expanding. As the integration of the AI industry and Web3 deepens, whether stablecoins can truly become the transaction infrastructure of the AI era is no longer just a technical question; it involves regulatory attitudes, ecosystem development, and market acceptance.

DEFI-2,21%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ETH_Maxi_Taxivip
· 12h ago
Hmm... The idea that stablecoins have become a necessity for AI trading sounds like Circle is creating a narrative for itself. Is traditional finance really that attractive? Not necessarily; the key issues are still cost and access rights. Billions of dollars in AI agent trading? Let's wait until this batch of AI survives the next bear market before talking. Speaking of which, stablecoins are indeed great over a 24-hour period, but what about security... Jeremy is just good at hyping; let's see if USDC can hold up until that day before discussing further.
View OriginalReply0
FloorSweepervip
· 18h ago
Are stablecoins a must-have for AI trading? Sounds good, but it still feels too optimistic haha Is USDT's dominant position really unbreakable? Wait, isn't this logic reversed... No matter how large AI proxy trading volume is, someone still has to buy in Can we trust what the folks at Davos are saying? They're just trying to hype up their own track Billions of AI proxies... Why do I find it hard to believe? Honestly, stablecoins are quite fragile now. How resilient are they to risks? Here we go again with stories. Is token economics really that beautiful? The real question is, will traditional finance really make way? That's the key, right? This kind of rhetoric sounds familiar from three years ago... Stablecoins are indeed fast, but what about security? Speed isn't everything.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBearDrawervip
· 01-22 12:22
Sigh, it's that kind of "future trend" rhetoric again, sounds pretty impressive... Stablecoins are indeed fast, but dozens of billions of AI agents trading simultaneously? That scene is a bit hard to believe. The traditional financial system is indeed lacking, I have to admit that. But I still want to see how it actually gets implemented, not just talk about the good stuff. By the way, Circle's recent publicity stunt is also clever, riding the AI hype to get attention. Honestly, who knows, I just believe in the long-term development of stablecoins, and let everything else take its course.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurkervip
· 01-22 12:22
Ha, Jeremy Allaire's statement sounds like he's just advertising his own business, but there is some truth to it... Stablecoins taking on big AI orders? Let's solve the current problems first. Oh wait, if billions of AI agents really get running, traditional finance definitely won't be able to keep up, I have to admit that. I just wonder if there will be another round of stablecoin risk panic by then, and whether trust will still be there at that time.
View OriginalReply0
MidsommarWalletvip
· 01-22 12:21
Billions of AI agents trading simultaneously? Sounds great, but who will ensure the stability of the stablecoin itself? Stablecoins are popular, but they still rely on centralized guarantees... I've heard Circle's explanation too many times. That said, traditional finance indeed falls short; the 24/7 aspect is truly unmatched. If that really happens, how much reserve would be needed for stablecoins? It feels like an astronomical number. Hmm... The prerequisite for a large-scale AI trading boom is having truly useful AI applications first. We're still a long way off.
View OriginalReply0
0xTherapistvip
· 01-22 12:19
You're at it again, trying to whitewash stablecoins. Talking about billions of AI agents in the future, so confidently? Is traditional finance really that terrible? I don't think it's that slow either. But when it comes to 24/7... hmm, okay, that's definitely a thing.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioningvip
· 01-22 12:18
Here comes the stablecoin talk again. I've heard this set of words for over a year. Billions of dollars in AI agent trading sounds grand, but now they don't even know which coin to use for AI, let alone the agents... Is traditional finance really that bad? It just feels like they're trying to find a sense of existence.
View OriginalReply0
PretendingToReadDocsvip
· 01-22 12:08
Ha, Circle's marketing this time is pretty good, directly tying AI and stablecoins together to tell a story... Wait, will AI agents worth billions really use stablecoins? I feel like it's still just hype. Traditional finance has already been competing in AI trading for a while; why insist on using on-chain assets? With the current scale of stablecoins, they are still the "only ones that can support" this? First, clarify the risks of USDT before hyping it up.
View OriginalReply0
PumpAnalystvip
· 01-22 12:07
Once again, Circle is telling stories, are stablecoins becoming essentials? Sounds like they're just finding reasons to pump their USDC [thinking] The large-scale trading by AI agents is indeed going to happen, but don’t be fooled by Allaire. Are traditional payment systems really that bad? The reality is that the big players are just eager to find new excuses to offload their positions. The technical aspect is fine, but such comments usually appear around the time of bottoming out. Fellow investors, stay alert and don’t rush in. I believe in the prospects of stablecoins, but most likely those entering now are just taking over for earlier investors. Risk control first, brothers. Just listen, don’t go all in. History always repeats itself with the same old pump-and-dump schemes.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)