【BlockBeats】On January 21, there was an interesting development—Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin revealed that he has started to play on the decentralized social track. Since the beginning of this year, all his posts and reading activities have been handled through Firefly.social, a multi-client tool that covers protocols like X, Lens, Farcaster, and Bluesky in one go, demonstrating his commitment through action.
More importantly, he shared a timeline: planning to fully return to the decentralized social ecosystem by 2026. He is also calling on the entire industry to re-examine the essence of “social.” Think about it, the套路 of centralized platforms is to maximize short-term engagement and speculative hype, but is that really what we need?
Vitalik believes that a truly valuable social tool should help people find high-quality information, rational voices, and genuine consensus, rather than pushing people into traffic traps. There are no shortcuts to achieving this goal—competition is essential, and decentralization excels at this. Through shared data layers, anyone can build their own client, and this openness itself is the fertile ground for competition.
He also pointed out an old problem in the crypto social field: “Is forcibly attaching speculative tokens to social products considered innovation?” This idea is outdated. Historically, projects that inflated prices around creators usually rewarded existing social status rather than content quality, and in the end, the tokens often didn’t end well.
In his view, decentralized social should be driven by teams genuinely concerned with “the social issues themselves,” rather than relying on financial narratives for support. Regarding Lens, he praised the governance work of the Aave team and has expectations for the new team taking over, believing they understand the essence of social better and have explored directions like crypto tweets early on.
Finally, he stated that in the coming year, he will speak more frequently on decentralized social platforms and encourages users to experience ecosystems like Lens and Farcaster more. Instead of being trapped in a single global information battlefield, it’s better to explore more open and diverse new interaction methods.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TestnetScholar
· 4h ago
V God’s move this time is really quite aggressive. Firefly directly jumped into four protocols, truly voting with their feet.
A full return in 2026 sounds like setting a flag for us, but upon reflection, the current social platforms are indeed completely rotten.
The short-term engagement metrics definitely need to be smashed, but I still have my doubts about whether decentralized social can really produce high-quality information, after all, without moderation it can easily turn into a cesspit.
This time, V God is leading the charge; whether the ecosystem can keep up remains to be seen.
It feels like a new wave of Web3 social narratives is about to begin again. I’m looking forward to the next wave of project funding peaks.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-74b10196
· 4h ago
Vitalik's move is truly impressive, aiming for a full return to decentralized social in 2026? Action-oriented people are just different, they say it and then do it.
Honestly, the short-term interaction tricks of centralized platforms should have been abandoned long ago.
Firefly connecting multiple protocols in one go—what a brilliant idea.
But to be honest, the key is whether it can truly be accessible to ordinary people. Decentralized social is still a bit high-threshold right now.
Finally, top industry leaders are speaking out about this. Looking forward to the changes in the next two years.
Can Bluesky, Farcaster, and others really get going? It still feels like they’re just circulating within small circles.
Voting with actions—that's the essence of Vitalik's style.
View OriginalReply0
NFTBlackHole
· 5h ago
Damn, V God is really getting serious. I've been using Firefly's multi-chain aggregation setup for a while, but this guy's directly declaring a 2026 return? What's the point?
That group of X should be panicking, but honestly, centralized social media is just selling anxiety. The short-term engagement tactics are old news.
The infrastructure for decentralized social is still too fragmented. Lens, Farcaster, Bluesky each do their own thing. When can we truly achieve seamless switching?
If V God sets the trend, we'll follow. Anyway, there's not much to lose—at worst, just another new narrative.
This time, calling for high-quality information is a bit idealistic. On-chain social will never escape speculation; isn't it the same old story wherever you go?
View OriginalReply0
ForumMiningMaster
· 5h ago
Hmm, V God has finally started using this approach too. It seems like it's time to get serious.
I've always said that decentralized social is the future. Now that the big players are leading by example, Firefly is indeed a remarkable tool.
Full return in 2026? That’s a pretty aggressive timeline. Is this a genuine awakening or just another wave of hype?
Centralized platforms are just a pile of trash, feeding you junk information every day. Social should be played this way.
By the way, are Lens and Farcaster really that powerful now? I'm a bit tempted—should I give it a try?
Vitalik is right—quality > popularity. That’s the core value of social.
If top builders are already using decentralized tools, what are others still competing on X for?
Vitalik announces a full return to decentralized social media, discusses the true competitiveness of Web3's future
【BlockBeats】On January 21, there was an interesting development—Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin revealed that he has started to play on the decentralized social track. Since the beginning of this year, all his posts and reading activities have been handled through Firefly.social, a multi-client tool that covers protocols like X, Lens, Farcaster, and Bluesky in one go, demonstrating his commitment through action.
More importantly, he shared a timeline: planning to fully return to the decentralized social ecosystem by 2026. He is also calling on the entire industry to re-examine the essence of “social.” Think about it, the套路 of centralized platforms is to maximize short-term engagement and speculative hype, but is that really what we need?
Vitalik believes that a truly valuable social tool should help people find high-quality information, rational voices, and genuine consensus, rather than pushing people into traffic traps. There are no shortcuts to achieving this goal—competition is essential, and decentralization excels at this. Through shared data layers, anyone can build their own client, and this openness itself is the fertile ground for competition.
He also pointed out an old problem in the crypto social field: “Is forcibly attaching speculative tokens to social products considered innovation?” This idea is outdated. Historically, projects that inflated prices around creators usually rewarded existing social status rather than content quality, and in the end, the tokens often didn’t end well.
In his view, decentralized social should be driven by teams genuinely concerned with “the social issues themselves,” rather than relying on financial narratives for support. Regarding Lens, he praised the governance work of the Aave team and has expectations for the new team taking over, believing they understand the essence of social better and have explored directions like crypto tweets early on.
Finally, he stated that in the coming year, he will speak more frequently on decentralized social platforms and encourages users to experience ecosystems like Lens and Farcaster more. Instead of being trapped in a single global information battlefield, it’s better to explore more open and diverse new interaction methods.