Truly reliable developers don't just look at transaction fees. If an excellent programmer wants to seriously participate in a project, they must obtain expected returns through chips—why would they invest core technology into your project and end up earning less than investors? Anyone can understand this logic.

What's even more painful is that a token that hasn't been tested by the market and hasn't faced true zeroing pressure is hard to earn the serious commitment of top developers. Because the best programmers know their own value, they will vote with their feet—only projects that can withstand storms and have a solid consensus foundation can attract their long-term investment.

Participants who only follow the trend blindly and lack independent judgment will never understand this balancing logic. The interests binding project parties, developers, and investors are the key to determining the health of the ecosystem.