Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
DeFi Security Controversy Rises Again. Industry authorities point out that the current development paradigm of "code is law" has become difficult to cope with the increasingly complex vulnerability risks. Data shows that in just the past year, hackers have stolen over $649 million through smart contract vulnerabilities, a staggering figure.
To reverse the situation, the industry is calling for a new approach of "regulation is law"—by establishing standardized security norms and deploying immutability check mechanisms to strengthen defenses at the contract level. This standardized solution can effectively prevent conventional hacking attacks.
But the challenges are escalating. Developers generally express concerns: as AI technology advances, attack methods are also iterating. AI-assisted vulnerability exploitation is no longer a low-probability event. This means that the competition for DeFi security has entered the "arms race" stage—defenders must continuously innovate to stay ahead of the disruptors.
Wait, can AI automatically find vulnerabilities? Doesn't that mean the defense side will always be stuck being pushed around?
Standardization and norms sound good, but what about actual implementation? I have a feeling this will end up as another unfinished project.