Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
A cybercrime case has attracted attention. A certain engineer was placed under investigation for suspected illegal intrusion into a gambling platform system and theft of funds, involving 183 bitcoins, which at the time were valued at over 80 million yuan. The procuratorate subsequently filed a public prosecution with the court for theft and infringement of citizens' personal information. This case involves multiple legal aspects — including direct asset theft and personal privacy data leakage — making it a typical cybercrime. Notably, although the assets involved are digital currencies, the judicial authorities handled the case entirely under traditional theft laws, indicating that Bitcoin has been explicitly recognized as property under the law. The court session is scheduled for January 2026. This case also serves as a reminder for holders to pay extra attention to private key security and platform selection — even for digital assets, legal protection applies.
---
Is it really that easy for gambling platform systems to be hacked? It shows that security is truly worrying, no wonder there are so many collapse incidents.
---
Wait, why is the court case only happening in 2026? Does the case have to be delayed that long?
---
Private key security definitely needs attention. It feels like someone gets phished every day, much more than the chances of being hacked.
---
183 coins, wow. This engineer really isn't afraid of death. No one can hide in front of the law.
---
So essentially, it's still theft. No matter how special the currency is, it can't be stopped. Rules are rules.
---
This case should serve as a warning to all on-chain major players. Choosing the wrong exchange can really be deadly.
---
Another rookie engineer, even if it's a scam platform, it wouldn't be so clumsy to leave so many original address traces.
---
Court date in January 2026? Those funds should have been frozen and their transfer tracks traced long ago. Now they probably have already been washed to who knows where.
---
Over 80 million worth of BTC being treated as ordinary theft... What does this imply? It shows that some departments still haven't understood on-chain signals.
---
This guy really uses his engineer identity to do this. Once the Bitcoin in the dormant wallet wakes up, it will be exposed. Laughable.
---
The issue isn't about the legal judgment; the key is where those 183 BTC are flowing now. Has anyone tracked the funds after the contract vulnerability?
---
Again emphasizing private key security... The real risk is that the platform itself is a sieve.
Now Bitcoin is officially recognized as property by the state, legal protection is definitely in place.
But on the other hand, is the platform's security so weak? Can a single engineer really hack in?
I’ve hidden my private key so deeply, afraid of being targeted.
---
Over 80 million gone, just because of a system vulnerability? I need to check my wallet
---
Legal recognition that BTC is property, this signal is still a bit interesting
---
Private keys really can't be sloppy at all, must treat them like life
---
Gambling platforms being hacked and funds stolen, how poor is the platform's security
---
The trial is not until 2026? How long will this case take through judicial procedures
---
BTC being judged as theft indicates that regulation is really becoming more standardized