The perpetual DEX landscape has shifted dramatically. With Hyperliquid commanding significant trading volume and user adoption, many traders are reconsidering their capital allocation across competing platforms. The reality: concentrating liquidity where execution is fastest and spreads tightest directly impacts profit margins. Why would savvy traders fragment their positions across platforms with inferior order books? Fundamentals matter—deeper liquidity, lower slippage, better funding rates. That's not hype, that's just arithmetic. The consolidation trend suggests the market is pricing in these efficiency gaps.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainFortuneTeller
· 3h ago
To be honest, hyperliquid has definitely taken a big slice of the pie this time, but I still think spreading out positions has its benefits.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 10h ago
According to on-chain data, Hyperliquid's daily trading volume has surpassed the combined total of the past three major perpetual DEXs. The underlying logic is actually the "law of laziness" of capital—why bother dispersing positions to endure poor slippage? From an economic perspective, the nonlinear premium of liquidity is accelerating platform centralization, with TVL aggregating towards the top about 36% faster than expected. Risk warning: Once this winner-takes-all pattern is formed, it is very difficult to reverse.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9f682d4c
· 10h ago
hyperliquid this wave is indeed fierce, but don't forget the original intention of decentralization.
View OriginalReply0
IntrovertMetaverse
· 10h ago
Liquidity really determines everything. An exchange without depth is useless even if it's cheap.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 10h ago
To be honest, Hyperliquid really outperformed other DEXs this time, with such a huge slippage difference—who would still diversify their positions? It's just asking for trouble.
The perpetual DEX landscape has shifted dramatically. With Hyperliquid commanding significant trading volume and user adoption, many traders are reconsidering their capital allocation across competing platforms. The reality: concentrating liquidity where execution is fastest and spreads tightest directly impacts profit margins. Why would savvy traders fragment their positions across platforms with inferior order books? Fundamentals matter—deeper liquidity, lower slippage, better funding rates. That's not hype, that's just arithmetic. The consolidation trend suggests the market is pricing in these efficiency gaps.