The Solana ecosystem has indeed exposed many issues recently. Projects are elaborately packaged, but quality varies greatly, and investors can easily stumble into pitfalls if they're not careful. From yesterday to today, some projects have gone to zero at a speed that is hard to defend against. Some leading participants within the ecosystem have relatively lax review standards, and their endorsements and promotions of projects appear to be overly hasty, which undoubtedly amplifies the risks. Compared to the loss speed on BSC, the situation on Solana is even more concerning. While experiencing rapid growth, risk management seems to have lagged behind. This serves as a reminder to investors that even on top-tier public chains, careful discernment is necessary, and reliance solely on ecosystem recommendations is not advisable.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ShibaMillionairen't
· 6h ago
Bro, this time with Solana, we really need to learn a lesson. It's not just about endorsing and relying on that kind of logic anymore.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 6h ago
The SOL ecosystem is just a big sieve; flashy packaging, but it resets even faster, and there's no way to prevent it.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSqueezer
· 7h ago
The speed of resetting to zero is indeed incredible, I don't even know who to trust for recommendations anymore.
The SOL ecosystem is a high-risk, high-reward casino; doing your homework is the only way out.
Endorsements from top projects have also failed, indicating that no one is really conducting thorough reviews.
No matter how fancy the packaging is, in the end, it still depends on whether the team is reliable.
Many people's dreams have been shattered in this wave; it's crucial to stay alert and cautious.
BSC has already given a warning, and SOL still repeating the same mistakes is truly outrageous.
Instead of trusting ecosystem recommendations, it's better to do more research yourself, after all, losing money is your own responsibility.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWang
· 7h ago
Alright, the SOL ecosystem is now just hot potato, whoever takes the last hit dies.
Sol's review process is virtually non-existent, really no quality control.
A pile of zero-return projects, endorsements seem as cheap as free.
Fast rug pulls, can't even prevent them, might as well stop touching it.
Can't say more, another project is being dismantled.
Copycats all end up losing money, the SOL ecosystem is a sieve.
Good packaging is useless, project strength is the key.
BSC suffered heavy losses, SOL is still adding more, truly incredible.
Top recommendations are unreliable, you need to have your own eyes.
The ecosystem is growing rapidly, but risk control is just running naked.
This wave of SOL is just making quick money off the sweat of players.
The Solana ecosystem has indeed exposed many issues recently. Projects are elaborately packaged, but quality varies greatly, and investors can easily stumble into pitfalls if they're not careful. From yesterday to today, some projects have gone to zero at a speed that is hard to defend against. Some leading participants within the ecosystem have relatively lax review standards, and their endorsements and promotions of projects appear to be overly hasty, which undoubtedly amplifies the risks. Compared to the loss speed on BSC, the situation on Solana is even more concerning. While experiencing rapid growth, risk management seems to have lagged behind. This serves as a reminder to investors that even on top-tier public chains, careful discernment is necessary, and reliance solely on ecosystem recommendations is not advisable.