The current bottleneck in the AI industry is not actually computing power; what truly troubles people is data compliance. The EU's AI Act mandates that model training data must be traceable, while in the US, copyright lawsuits are emerging one after another. Domestically, the requirements for data usage regulations are becoming increasingly strict. However, existing storage solutions all have fatal flaws. Centralized storage sounds impressive with guarantees of data compliance, but how can others trust you? Decentralized storage, while transparent and open, does a poor job of protecting privacy.
Looking at Walrus's Seal feature, this is the real idea. It's not just about file encryption; instead, it has built a complete programmable access control system. Coupled with Sui's smart contracts, it can achieve data management that both preserves privacy and allows for traceability. For AI training data needs, this directly addresses the pain point.
Seal's approach lies in threshold key management. Traditional encryption schemes face two dead ends: either you manage the keys yourself and risk losing them, or you entrust them to a third party and feel uneasy. Seal's method disperses the key across multiple nodes, with each node only holding a part. Decryption requires reaching a set threshold. For example, 10 nodes must agree with at least 6 to decrypt, ensuring security while avoiding single points of failure.
Even more clever is that decryption permissions are programmable. You can write a smart contract on Sui to define decryption conditions: only users holding a specific NFT can access, or only during certain time periods, or require multi-party signatures for decryption. All these logic operations are executed on-chain, making them transparent and auditable. This should be a good solution for AI data that needs to meet various compliance requirements.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TooScaredToSell
· 6h ago
Now the deadlock in data compliance is truly resolved. The previous centralized and decentralized solutions were just a tug-of-war.
The idea of Seal's threshold key is brilliant, much more reliable than those flashy encryption schemes.
The key is programmable access control, on-chain execution with transparent auditing—that's what AI training data truly needs.
However, how is the adoption of the Sui ecosystem right now? Will anyone really follow suit?
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretDiary
· 6h ago
The threshold key system is indeed impressive; it's much more reliable than those centralized schemes that just talk big.
Seal is like installing a smart lock on data; it balances privacy and transparency, which is rare in Web3.
Speaking of which, the AI data compliance issue has long needed someone to address it; too many talk without action.
View OriginalReply0
blocksnark
· 6h ago
The design of Seal indeed solves a big problem, the threshold key logic is impressive.
---
The trust issues with centralized storage are indeed unavoidable, but decentralization is not a silver bullet.
---
Programmable access control is quite interesting, much more flexible than pure encryption schemes.
---
Finally, someone has balanced privacy and traceability together, which is what Web3 should be doing.
---
Using Sui's contract layer in conjunction with Seal for AI data management is indeed a good idea.
---
The threshold key decentralization approach, which avoids single points of failure, shows some depth.
---
Wait, could such a scheme encounter performance bottlenecks during actual deployment?
---
The data compliance issues have been a bottleneck for so long, but now there's finally a somewhat reliable technical solution.
View OriginalReply0
GigaBrainAnon
· 6h ago
Wait, can Walrus's threshold key really solve compliance issues? It still seems to depend on the actual implementation results.
View OriginalReply0
EthMaximalist
· 6h ago
Finally, someone has explained compliance thoroughly: excess computing power makes privacy a luxury
The Walrus approach is indeed innovative; threshold keys are much more reliable than traditional encryption
Programmable access control combined with Sui smart contracts... this is what Web3 should be doing
The current bottleneck in the AI industry is not actually computing power; what truly troubles people is data compliance. The EU's AI Act mandates that model training data must be traceable, while in the US, copyright lawsuits are emerging one after another. Domestically, the requirements for data usage regulations are becoming increasingly strict. However, existing storage solutions all have fatal flaws. Centralized storage sounds impressive with guarantees of data compliance, but how can others trust you? Decentralized storage, while transparent and open, does a poor job of protecting privacy.
Looking at Walrus's Seal feature, this is the real idea. It's not just about file encryption; instead, it has built a complete programmable access control system. Coupled with Sui's smart contracts, it can achieve data management that both preserves privacy and allows for traceability. For AI training data needs, this directly addresses the pain point.
Seal's approach lies in threshold key management. Traditional encryption schemes face two dead ends: either you manage the keys yourself and risk losing them, or you entrust them to a third party and feel uneasy. Seal's method disperses the key across multiple nodes, with each node only holding a part. Decryption requires reaching a set threshold. For example, 10 nodes must agree with at least 6 to decrypt, ensuring security while avoiding single points of failure.
Even more clever is that decryption permissions are programmable. You can write a smart contract on Sui to define decryption conditions: only users holding a specific NFT can access, or only during certain time periods, or require multi-party signatures for decryption. All these logic operations are executed on-chain, making them transparent and auditable. This should be a good solution for AI data that needs to meet various compliance requirements.