2026-01-19 22:41:28

Some project promoters are calling out the irony: critics who publicly slam reward-based posting systems turn around and offer sponsored posts for $200. The contradiction between denouncing incentive models and capitalizing on them reveals deeper tensions in how Web3 projects handle community engagement versus paid promotion.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BearEatsAll

· 12h ago

Well... the nice way to say it is "flexible and adaptable," but the harsh truth is double standards. There are plenty of people like that in this circle.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainNewbie

· 12h ago

Haha, this is hilarious. These people shout about opposing the incentive system, but then turn around and sell copywriting for $200. Truly amazing.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeDodger

· 12h ago

These people really crack me up. They shout about opposing the incentive mechanism, but turn around and sell sponsorship posts for $200. It's a classic case of only allowing officials to set fires and not letting the common people light lamps.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwichVictim

· 13h ago

Exactly right, these guys are really something... They oppose incentive mechanisms verbally, but then turn around and post sponsorships for $200 each. It's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

PositionPhobia

· 13h ago

Basically, those who oppose the incentive model verbally are turning around and charging $200 per sponsored post. It really cracks me up.

View OriginalReply0

NFTragedy

· 13h ago

Well... the polite way to put it is "flexible and adaptable," but a less polite way is double standards. In the Web3 community, stuff like this happens all the time.

View OriginalReply0