Looking at whether a crypto project can go far, token design is an indispensable hard indicator. Walrus Protocol's planning for $WAL is very interesting — it clearly involves long-term strategy rather than relying on short-term pumps to suck liquidity.
The design of $WAL is solid: governance rights, incentive rights, and profit rights are all bundled together. Holding it allows participation in the protocol's growth dividends and provides a voice in deciding the project's direction. Tokens are no longer just gambling chips but have tangible utility.
What’s even smarter is the incentive logic — encouraging liquidity provision, governance participation, network maintenance, and ecosystem development are all directly linked to rewards. This way, tokens gradually flow to those who truly create value for the system, naturally forming a healthy distribution rather than being dumped by early whales.
Another clever aspect is the value support mechanism. As the protocol's usage increases, token value is reinforced through fee redistribution and token burning. This shifts the focus from purely market sentiment to real demand. When demand exists, value follows.
In the community, more long-term participants are now involved in building and locking tokens, indicating that everyone understands this logic. The ceiling of Walrus Protocol essentially depends on how many real users and real application scenarios it can accumulate — and this is precisely where it is strongest right now.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StakeOrRegret
· 44m ago
Wow, this token design is indeed not so reckless, much more reliable than most projects.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightMEVeater
· 6h ago
Good morning, it's midnight at 2:00. After reading this article, I have one feeling — finally someone is taking token design seriously, not just a pure pump paradise. The $WAL incentive logic is indeed interesting, reminding me of a few dead projects I saw last year, where people were busy sandwich attacking in the dark pool, and no one cared whether the protocol itself was alive or not. The real difference lies here: a value support mechanism that can sustain itself, while those relying solely on market sentiment ultimately become robot playgrounds. But on the other hand, can actual users really come in, or is it just another liquidity trap? Time will tell us the answer.
View OriginalReply0
MetamaskMechanic
· 6h ago
This token design is indeed different. It's finally refreshing to see a project that isn't just about purely scamming investors.
View OriginalReply0
OfflineValidator
· 6h ago
Honestly, projects with solid token design are indeed rare, and this $WAL setup doesn't seem to have any obvious pitfalls.
View OriginalReply0
DeepRabbitHole
· 6h ago
Finally, someone has explained tokenomics thoroughly. The $WAL design is indeed different.
A truly useful token must have real power, not just air tokens. Walrus has understood this.
There have been too many projects wiped out by early big investors dumping, so it's reassuring to see the community truly locking tokens.
Looking at whether a crypto project can go far, token design is an indispensable hard indicator. Walrus Protocol's planning for $WAL is very interesting — it clearly involves long-term strategy rather than relying on short-term pumps to suck liquidity.
The design of $WAL is solid: governance rights, incentive rights, and profit rights are all bundled together. Holding it allows participation in the protocol's growth dividends and provides a voice in deciding the project's direction. Tokens are no longer just gambling chips but have tangible utility.
What’s even smarter is the incentive logic — encouraging liquidity provision, governance participation, network maintenance, and ecosystem development are all directly linked to rewards. This way, tokens gradually flow to those who truly create value for the system, naturally forming a healthy distribution rather than being dumped by early whales.
Another clever aspect is the value support mechanism. As the protocol's usage increases, token value is reinforced through fee redistribution and token burning. This shifts the focus from purely market sentiment to real demand. When demand exists, value follows.
In the community, more long-term participants are now involved in building and locking tokens, indicating that everyone understands this logic. The ceiling of Walrus Protocol essentially depends on how many real users and real application scenarios it can accumulate — and this is precisely where it is strongest right now.