Zero-knowledge proofs look solid on paper, but let's be real—how do they actually handle scaling to massive transaction volumes? The cryptographic elegance is there, but when we're talking about millions of transactions per second, the computational overhead becomes a genuine bottleneck. Is the current architecture even capable of hitting those throughput targets without sacrificing security or decentralization?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DegenGamblervip
· 6h ago
zk proof sounds cool, but when it comes to millions of TPS, can the computing power handle it? To be honest, it's still a trade-off; the classic triangle problem can't be bypassed.
View OriginalReply0
retroactive_airdropvip
· 6h ago
zk proof sounds impressive, but in practice it's still so-so; there's too much hype involved.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainMessengervip
· 7h ago
zk proofs sound impressive, but once you reach the million TPS level, it becomes obvious. No one can bypass the computational workload.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagrantvip
· 7h ago
To put it simply, ZK proofs are indeed impressive in theory, but in practice? Well, let's be modest.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)