2026-01-19 21:34:06

Just realized how the creator payment model actually works—turns out I only generate revenue when viewed from the algorithmic feed, not the following tab. So here's the thing: I'm deliberately switching to following-only interactions now. Yeah, petty move? Maybe. But if the system incentivizes feed surfing over genuine follows, why play along? Time to support creators differently.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MainnetDelayedAgain

· 8h ago

According to the database, another creator has discovered that the platform's pie is in its nth fermentation... This time, let's look at it from a different perspective, starting with the delay in the revenue model. How many days have passed since the promise of "equal treatment" when there is money only in the feed and no profit from follow tags? It is recommended to be included in the Guinness World Records.

View OriginalReply0

DaoGovernanceOfficer

· 8h ago

ngl the payment structure here is peak perverse incentive design. empirically speaking, this is exactly why token-weighted voting fails without proper quadratic mechanisms—misaligned incentives compound across the system. your move makes sense tbh

Reply0

SilentAlpha

· 8h ago

Wow, so that's how the system works? No wonder those creators have to kowtow to the algorithm, it's really incredible.

View OriginalReply0